What? Howard Dean is having a tantrum that Indiana has passed a photo ID bill for voting? Why?
It comes as a shock, I know, that illegal aliens, out of towners, out of staters, folks with multiple addresses, college students, felons who aren't supposed to, and the dead vote any number of times in our elections with the precision of an IBM punch card machine.
You may also notice that these disparate groups are all valued members of the great new growing all-encompassing big tent Democratic Party, especially those without any documents, convicted criminals and the newly buried.
It also should come as no surprise at all that a study in New Jersey awhile ago found that the overwhelming majority of the five thousand or so dead who voted in the 2004 election went Democrat.
In fact, the sheer numbers of dead who managed to get to the polls in Jersey were so shocking that it caused a judge to order that the polling lists be immediately expunged of the voting incorporeals.
Deputy sheriffs will be asked to advise cemetery owners and operators to lock down their gates to insure that their charges stay put during the hours the polls are open, in an attempt to keep the walking zombies, victims of Voodoo curses and bad juju away from the ballot boxes in Bergen County.
Now, in Indiana, we're told that the DNC and state Democratic leaders have banded together to fight the new voter ID bill, which was recently passed, requiring a photo ID to vote, all in an attempt to halt these wild free wheeling ongoing infractions in state elections.
and Howard Dean, that convivial proponent of the tsunami of undocumented american entry and the gagged up nonsense bawling leader of the DNC, has exclaimed that this new law will keep some people from voting.
But Howard, of course it will, and it'll serve to keep the riff-raff away from the ballot box.
By demanding that people coming to the polls--a sacred right, not a privilege like driving--to possess a valid photo ID, it'll kick out the illegal aliens, the felons and the doggone dead right off the top--three key growing and voting Democratic constituencies.
Then, to add fuel to the growing fire, a federal judge, gasp, no, it sure appears that Clinton didn't appoint this one, agreed with Indiana's law, dealing the Democrats a stunning set-back in their attempts to re-pack the ballot boxes.
Mr. Dean, stunned by this foul jolt of reality, promises an appeal, and will base it on the equal protection clause--for non-citizens, felons and the recently dead, whose post death wishes were well known only to local party activists. Others were known to contact the living through séances and the Bible code.
Meanwhile, in the Granite State, in the Live Free or Die environs, where enforced amnesia is running rife, Governor John Lynch, an emerging Democrat of Howard Dean ilk in pin striped clothing, who recently entertained Bill Richardson, fearing for the continued survival of a similar cross section of threatened voters, and remembering how close the elections were in 2000 and in 2004, in his first veto of the year, shot down a similar law.
"Our responsibility as elected officials is to protect every citizen's constitutional right to vote and to ensure that any proposed changes to our voting system do not create unnecessary barriers to our voting." Mr. Lynch steadfastly offered to the favored Democratic voting blocs of illegal aliens-- certainly not wishing in any way to impede their appearance at the voting booth--felons and the newly dead, whose wishes, again, were surely known before their sudden, untimely and shocking demise.
It is surprising how political courage varies between two states, how pandering continues, and how far New Hampshire has fallen from its one time flinty, New England, go it alone, voting is an inviolable act, image, to one of outright truckling with scofflaws and the dearly departed.
While Indiana has taken a solid step to protect the sanctity of the ballot box, found in 2000 to possess so many inconsistencies, and to quiet the growing concerns of its restive citizens about the electoral process, New Hampshire, in the club tie guise of its new Democratic Governor, has chosen to keep the ballot box open for fraud and maintain the fear associated with voting malpractice.
Will the Governor Lynch's veto be overturned?
Will Howard Dean, in his staunch protection of the three pillars of resurgent Democratic power in the new century, prevail in his heartfelt appeal for the lamisters, the criminals and the wandering kelpies?
Who would've imagined that the Democrats would be fighting publicly, tooth and nail, with appeals and vetoes, for these stellar bands of balloteers.
There, but for fortune, go you and I.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement