Canada Free Press -- ARCHIVES

Because without America, there is no free world.

Return to Canada Free Press

Murtha, Pelosi, Dems, government in waiting

Democrats–Who'll be the next in line for heartache?

By John Burtis
Monday, June 12, 2006

Great rivers of destiny are churning just below the Electoral dam.

It looks like the stage is being set for the next round of heartbreak for the Democrats, their quest for 15 seats in the House and their need to overthrow the Republicans in that charnel house of the Senate, should this, their greatest of all electoral endeavors, not pan out.

We have just witnessed a few key warm ups illustrating what the fall elections and their aftermath will look like if the Democrats, gasp, should fail to capture both houses of Congress. Despite a feat already foretold in the million gallons of black ink spilt in their slavish supine press, seen in the crystal ball of their many bandanna wrapped seers, trumpeted from the pulpits occupied by their gagged up prophets, scrawled on the walls of the portable public bathrooms in San Francisco, facts bawled by rapturous Hillary Clinton to her paying customers, and to Democrats, high and low, in the form of endless chain letters, plaintive e-mails, grotesque air america rants and fantastic fund raising letters.

a great conspiracy of sweeping electoral loss has been buttressed of late by folk tales rich in schizophrenic reminiscences, of sweeping invisible police round ups of minority voters, of national conspiracies directed from the dank caverns below the White House by Mr. Cheney, of scientifically accurate exit polls trumped by actual election numbers — an outlandish impossibility, of county electoral workers who were confused, and of the dearly departed, whose absentee ballots were counted late, overlooked, or thrown out.

The list of the ways the election was stolen by the Republicans is nearly endless, as are those willing to pontificate on the reasons and wherefores. and it marks a true watershed in american history; the first time the party of electoral theft — the Democrats — claims they had an election stolen from their own rotten boroughs.

Just a few weeks ago, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., issued a report, with over 70 foot notes, which lays bare the vastness of treachery necessary to deprive Mr. John Kerry of the 2004 Presidential election — and it has gotten no traction whatsoever — as telling a piece of evidence of the huge conspiracy as the stolen election itself.

all this when the real polling data, from the most trustworthy polling services in existence today, offered by the likes of the New York Times, Zogby, CNN, USa Today, aBC — honest folks with absolutely no axe to grind in the alphabet soup of liberal thoughts and deeds — show that President Bush's popularity is zilch, nada, zippo and reaching a new nadir every day and every passing minute.

Could it be within the realm of possibility that the Democrats might possibly lose? Of course not, despite the hint of trouble in the Duke's old stomping grounds.

The Democrats, with a kindly view to the future of america and the numbers at hand, are already assembling their next government.

Proud, thankful men, like Hanging Judge John Murtha, who have forsaken all petty personal lunges for power, have stepped into the breach to selflessly offer themselves for positions in the next honest and upright administration — one that will be noted for truth, justice and the american way. and he's joined Speaker Nancy Pelosi in selecting her new office furniture, drapes, colored papyrus and styli.

Other folks, like former General Wes Clark, who have never held a big name political position, are now elbowing their way through the long dull plodding blue pin-striped line, jockeying for position in the brave new Democratic world, where verity, candor and Puritan behavior will reign again as it did during those halcyon Clinton years. Wes, a shy retiring man, not noted for being grabby, nor swapping hats with a wanted war criminal, will certainly settle for a small humble position like Secretary of Defense.

Then we have the a-listers, people who have already served with absolute distinction and honor, like, oh, Sandy Berger. Mr. Berger, now off parole, with a record as clean as the 12 million once criminal aliens, will be wrestling for a top slot in the next Democratic corporation, if that's not too capitalistic a term for the hodgepodge of competing socialist fiefdoms which will jockey for power under the wise tutelage of the next Democratic President.

as for the next President, well, it seems a bit early to say whether it'll be Hillary, by unanimous acclaim of the huddled insurance-less masses and why vote at all, al Gore, by the singular voice of the progressive media who have announced, at least for the moment, that he is their darling above all others and why vote again, or Chris Dodd, the upright outré humbug from Connecticut.

and here is the rub, what will happen if the Democrats - after all the current push polls, RFK Jr.'s latest psychopathic babble, the noted veracity of the previous exit polls, the millions of turncoat Christian zealots expected after a few seedy paternalistic Howard Dean adumbrations, the accepted wisdom of the upcoming exit polls, the millions of respectful sombrero doffing illegals — fail to return to power?

What will come to pass when the months of highly controllable media acclaim does not propel the Democrats back to the very seats of supremacy which they, by rights, should hold in perpetuity?

Suppose the growing groundswell of victory does not materialize as has been so vividly prophesied by the polls, the hucksters, pitch men, scriveners, hotshots, touts, and the rampant raucous commentators and is proven to have been a hoax of a bubble?

Who will be the next in line for heartache?

Who'll be the next in line to cry conspiracy over this election, too?

Who will get to the microphone first?


Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement