While real killer diseases that could be prevented or cured get scant attention
By Michael Fumento
Friday, august 25, 2006
Calls for prevention highlighted the opening day of the 16th International aIDS Conference in Toronto. Unfortunately, it's too late. On the same day, the Washington Post carried a photo on its front page depicting a man wearing a T-shirt that read: "We all have aIDS."
Toss out those condoms; forget abstinence, and don't bother getting tested. Or what part of "all" don't you understand?
Seriously, this bit of propaganda is but one illustration of how aIDS prevention has always been handicapped by politics. Nobody believes we all have aIDS; but many have bought into the "Everyone is at risk" nonsense that clearly works against targeting those truly at risk. The entire science of epidemiology — which began when London physician John Snow determined that cholera cases in his city clustered around a single water pump — depends on identifying risk factors to ameliorate them. In Snow's case, he simply removed the pump handle and the epidemic ended.
He was lucky he didn't have to deal with activists carrying signs reading: "Water doesn't cause cholera; ignorance and prejudice cause cholera!"
Since 1985, when Life magazine blared in huge red letters: "Now No One Is Safe from aIDS," activists have fought furiously against the idea that aIDS targets those who engage in selective behaviors. Yet over two decades later aIDS remains in this country overwhelmingly a disease of homosexual males and intravenous drug users. Fewer than 39,000 americans were diagnosed with aIDS in 2004 (latest data available), and fewer than 16,000 died from it. That's about one in 770 and one in 1,875 respectively. Fact is, almost everybody is safe from aIDS.
But of course, the focus of this conference is on international aIDS, which we all know is wiping whole continents off the map. a high Ugandan official said that within two years his nation will "be a desert." aBC News Nightline declared that within 12 years "50 million africans may have died of aIDS."
Problem is, those predictions were made in 1986 and 1988. Yet since 1985, Uganda's population has doubled. Nightline's 50 million dead by the year 2000 proved to be 20 million by 2005, according to the UN's estimate. Further, "In sub-Saharan africa, the region with the largest burden of the aIDS epidemic, data also indicate that the HIV incidence rate has peaked in most countries," according to the 2006 UNaIDS Report.
Yet the UN itself has historically grossly exaggerated the world aIDS threat. For example, in 1998 it estimated that 12% of Rwandans age 15-49 were infected; now it says it's only 3%. Whoops. On the other hand, other agencies had estimated a horrific 30% of Rwandans were infected. according to James Chin, a former U.N. official who made some of the earliest global HIV estimates, such concocted figures are "pure advocacy."
Yet former President Bill Clinton told conference attendees that "It's difficult to imagine how the world can grow unless we tackle aIDS." In fact world population growth is fastest in areas hardest hit by aIDS.
as for the bizarre assertion that aIDS remains yet to be tackled, UNaIDS reports that 1.3 million people in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral therapy in 2004, up from a fifth that number in 2001. Donated blood is now screened in even the poorest countries. The level of aIDS testing and education in poorer nations has skyrocketed.
Meanwhile, worldwide aIDS spending averaged $1.7 billion between 2002-2004 but reached $8.3 billion for 2005 and is slated to hit $10 billion in 2007. The size of that pie, and the desire to have a slice of it, is all you need to know to understand how the Toronto conference could attract a stunning 24,000 attendees who have been rightly labeled "the aIDS industry." Nevertheless, insists UNaIDS, that $10 billion isn't nearly enough.
No matter that even the current aIDS budget swamps spending on malaria and tuberculosis, which together kill about twice as many people annually as does aIDS. antiretroviral therapy for aIDS cures no one, but it does cost relatively little in the Third World ($300-$1,200 per person per year) compared to North america. By contrast, TB can be cured with $65 of medicine.
Malaria in africa and asia can be prevented for a pittance — about $3 per home — by spraying DDT on the inside walls of houses, to protect everyone inside for a year. Yet, environmental activists and the European Union have essentially blocked its use in areas most need it.
alas for these victims, they don't have a politically correct disease. and for that they must die.
www.fumento.comMichael Fumento is a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and a former army paratrooper. author of BioEvolution: How Biotechnology Is Changing Our World, and Science Under Siege: Balancing Technology and the Environment He can be reached at: Fumento@pobox.com
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement