By J.B. Williams
Saturday, August 4, 2007
Eager to knock the former First Victim from her assumed-to-be partisan nomination, presidential candidate Barack Been Hussein Obama leaped to the tip of the weakest branch on the wilting tree of Democrat leadership today.
Reacting to widespread criticisms of his gross inexperience, child-like naivet and pure ignorance regarding international diplomacy with third world thugs, presidential wannabe Barrack Obama made perhaps his boldest, albeit ill-advised, maneuver by attempting to grab the War on Terror mantle for his party, which otherwise seems to not notice that such a thing actually exists.
"I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges," Obama said. "But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
Now he and former First Victim Hillary Clinton are in a rhetorical showdown over who is willing to nuke those folks eager to nuke us first if they get the chance.
Who would have thought we would ever hear a Democrat presidential candidate calling for the US military invasion of a sovereign nation which not only did not attack us on 9/11, but has worked pretty hard to play ally to America ever since? When Bush announced "You are either with us or against us" days after 9/11, Musharraf listened. It's Democrats who have chosen the wrong side in the war ever since, including Obama and Clinton.
This inside-the-party chest pounding can't make the spineless retreat and defeat core of today's Democrat Party happy at all. So why the sudden bluster? War-mongering talk like this just won't play well in the Code Pinko base of today's Democrat Party. Is this a demonstration of belated backbone or just another empty example of political testosterone gone wild? I'll give you the facts and you decide…
We begin by properly dissecting his statement.
"There are terrorists holed up in those mountains" – According to his party, these folks are "freedom fighters" resisting American global domination? Since when did any Democrat think they were "terrorists"?
"who murdered 3,000 Americans" – Doesn't he mean, 3000 capitalist pigs seeking daily profit for personal greed?
"They are plotting to strike again." – Fear-mongering, pure fear-mongering! We have no evidence of any credible threat, say Pelosi and Reid!
"It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005." – Wait a minute… Obama is focused only upon a chance to get Bin Laden AFTER 9/11 in 2005?
January 25: Mir Aimal Kansi, a Pakistani, fires an AK-47 assault rifle into cars waiting at a stoplight in front of the Central Intelligence Agency headquarters, killing two and injuring three others, see FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives.
February 26: World Trade Center bombing kills six and injures over 1000 people, by coalition of five groups: Jamaat Al-Fuqra'/Gamaat Islamiya/Hamas/Islamic Jihad/National Islamic Front,[84] see FBI Most Wanted Terrorists, FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, Ramzi Yousef.
June: Failed New York City landmark bomb plot, see FBI Most Wanted Terrorists
March 1: In the Brooklyn Bridge Shooting, Rashid Baz kills a Hasidic seminary student and wounds four on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City in response to the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre.[87]
March 8: Terrorists in Karachi, Pakistan, armed with automatic rifles, murdered two American consulate employees and wounded a third as they traveled in the consulate shuttle bus.
February 24: Ali Abu Kamal opens fire on tourists at an observation deck atop the Empire State Building in New York City, United States, killing a Danish national and wounding visitors from the United States, Argentina, Switzerland and France before turning the gun on himself. A handwritten note carried by the gunman claims this was a punishment attack against the "enemies of Palestine". His widow claimed he became suicidal after losing $300,000 in a business venture. In a 2007 interview with the New York Daily News his daughter said her mothers story was a cover crafted by the Palestinian Authority and that her father wanted to punish the United States for its support of Israel.[90]
August 7: U.S. embassy bombings in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya, killing 225 people and injuring more than 4,000, by al-Qaeda, see FBI Most Wanted Terrorists
December 14: Ahmed Ressam is arrested on the United States--Canada border in Port Angeles, Washington; he confessed to planning to bomb the Los Angeles International Airport as part of the 2000 millennium attack plots
The last of the 2000 millennium attack plots fails, as the boat meant to bomb USS The Sullivans sinks.
October 12: USS Cole bombing kills 17 US sailors and wounds 40 off the port coast of Aden, Yemen, by al-Qaeda, see FBI Most Wanted Terrorists, the Buffalo Six Lackawanna Cell.[103]
Even Clinton friendly lamestream news outlets confirmed and reported, "In its exhaustive report, the 9/11 Commission identified at least five separate times in 1998 and 1999 when operations were underway to get bin Laden. In only one case was there a decision to proceed." ABC News
But Obama thinks it was some kind of "mistake" that our military, hot on his heels, failed to capture or kill Bin Laden before he slipped across the border into Pakistan? Who made the mistake? And if that was a "mistake", what would he call the eight years of Clinton rule, a catastrophic calamity?
"If we have actionable intelligence"- Since we had twelve years of "actionable" intelligence against the Hussein regime in Iraq, which Obama fails to grasp even today, shouldn't Obama define his idea of actionable intelligence?
"If President Musharraf won't act, we will." – What, - attack a sovereign nation that did not attack us? Without an exit strategy? You can't be serious!
No sir… This news isn't going to fly well over at Howard Dean headquarters at all. Those Code Pinko bloomers are in a wad for sure today. The retreat and defeat base of the DNC will be ringing up the moonbat phone to Jack Murtha, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid every hour on the hour, which surely can't support a war-mongering doctrine like this, can they?
What happened to the "can't we all just get along" doctrine of the Democrat Party? I thought Obama wanted to sit down with the world's most brutal killers over tea and talk things out?
Does he mean what he say's? Or is this just another circus style campaign stunt, a typical liberal testosterone induced saber rattling for the mindless voters behind the "can't we just surrender" left?
What kind of message is Obama trying to send here and to whom is he trying to send it?
Well, what would you do in your ego driven quest for an office you are highly unqualified for, once someone pointed out just how unqualified you really are?
You would either shrink your ego back into reality and admit that they have a point - or come out firing bluster aimed at fooling the fools into thinking you're something you have never been in your entire pathetic little life.
Don't confuse backbone with politically driven testosterone. Terrorists know the difference even if you don't and that will get you killed…
Tough talk should be reserved for people willing to take tough action, even when it is unpopular. Never swat a hornet's nest unless you have a plan for the swarming hornets…
Obama clearly thinks that only his voters are listening. Nothing could be further from reality. And that's what makes Obama and all Democrats dangerous today. All blow and no go!
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement