...And Then There Were Two

One can want Cain to be innocent—I do—but one cannot deny the squeamishness induced by his lawyer’s statement


On November 28th, I posted an article defending Herman Cain against the takedown being perpetrated against him by the Republican establishment and the media. For several hours, readers sent supportive comments, appreciating my effort to refocus the lens onto Cain’s policy strengths and personal appeal. Suddenly, however, the comments turned in a new direction, as news broke of a woman alleging a 13-year affair with the candidate, and one which had continued into very recent times. “It’s over,” shouted those who never liked him anyway. “It’s over,” furthermore, lamented some who, like this writer, had wished to believe that the very worst claim against Cain, even if it were true, represented a moment of moral weakness more than a decade ago, an episode that ended—according to the accuser—with Cain accepting the premise that “No means No.”
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy



CFP Disqus Comments