Candidates managed to cut through moderator nonsense to give us some substance
Sadly, thanks to the moderators, it was very difficult for anyone to work in much discussion of substance. So kudos to everyone who made the effort to do so anyway
By Herman Cain —— Bio and Archives--November 2, 2015
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
Believe it or not, there actually was some substance discussed during the Republican presidential debate on CNBC Wednesday night. No thanks to the moderators, of course, who asked questions that were either designed to start fights or create gotcha moments.
How CNBC even mustered the self-respect to go on the air the following morning is beyond me, so thoroughly did they embarrass themselves with that performance.
But fortunately, the candidates did a good job of what you might call pivoting, which is to say: They ignored the lack of substance in the moderator questions and discussed substantive issues anyway.Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy