Fake Indigenous Law Subverts Formal Canadian Law
This decision speaks volumes about the need to reconsider the causes and consequences of the racially and ethnically discriminatory Gladue principles and sentencing circle recommendations;
By Hymie Rubenstein —— Bio and Archives--October 16, 2026
Cover Story | Comments | Back To Full Article
On October 9, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that judges must consider “sentencing circle” recommendations for Indigenous offenders, effectively prioritizing aboriginal perspectives in sentencing. This decision creates a parallel legal system, requiring courts to “braid” Indigenous law with Canadian law, a concept that undermines the principle of equality before the law. The ruling came in an appeal by Harry Arthur Cope, a part-Mi’kmaq man who originally received a reduced incarceration after a “sentencing circle” recommended no further jail time.
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy