Has SCOTUS redefined the 14th Amendment to apply to birth tourism?
If Title IX can protect against discrimination by sex by elucidating the original intent of a Constitutional definition of male and female, why can’t Congress do the same with ‘jurisdiction thereof,’ ‘domicile,’ and ‘reside,’ regarding citizenship?
By A. Dru Kristenev —— Bio and Archives--July 1, 2026
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
Don’t think so.
The opinion on Trump v. Barbara sent down by the majority of Supreme Court justices may have indicated the Fourteenth Amendment grants citizenship to illegals living in the United States, but it revolves around how they’ve overlooked the parenthetical application of “jurisdiction thereof.”
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy