By Dan Calabrese —— Bio and Archives--December 8, 2015
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
Something to remember about Obama's persistent refusal to commit U.S. ground troops, not only against ISIS, but in any Middle East military conflict: It's always been a political calculation, based on his belief (correct, I'd say) that he was elected in large part because Americans were sick of wars. No matter how bad it's getting over there, Obama has always seen it as a political winner to reject any sort of drawn-out battle on the ground because that takes us back to the Bush-Cheney years, and people grew weary of that in short order.
Problem: The public will only back your refusal to fight until it becomes painfully clear that there's a real threat that needs to be dealt with, and that farming out the job to other countries with far less military prowess than the United States is not likely to get the job done. Obama bet that he could sit on his hands militarily and the situation wouldn't get bad enough to turn the public in favor of a ground war involving U.S. troops.The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy