Liberal judge concocts quite a creative rationale for tossing Trump's military transgender ban
All of which amounts to little more than . . . she doesn't like it
By Dan Calabrese —— Bio and Archives--November 1, 2017
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
I'll give rare kudos to Slate here, where writer Mark Joseph Stern went into a lot more detail than the MSM in explaining exactly why Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued a ruling halting President Trump's ban on transgenders serving in the military. Stern clearly thinks her reasoning is solid. But I think it's useful to those who believe the president had the authority to issue the ban, precisely because Judge Kollar-Kotelly's argument is so lacking in actual legal reasoning.
What follows is mostly Stern's summary of her argument, with the italicized portion coming from the judge itself:Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy