New (Politically Correct) Energy Conversations
Climate alarmism, in particular, has failed as a voter issue
By Institute for Energy Research —— Bio and Archives--December 6, 2010
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Back To Full Article
Last Monday, the Wall Street Journal had a special section on Energy with the lead essay, “How to Change the Global Energy Conversation.” It contrasted old with new, the old being radical energy transformation (e.g. “impose strict controls on carbon-dioxide emissions”) and the new being incrementalism (e.g. “focus on modest emissions reductions such as replacing old diesel generators”). Perhaps the era of Big Government in energy is going on pause.
Read Full Article...
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy