New York Times: Yeah yeah, Gosnell is bad, but the ‘real issue’ is pro-lifers oppose cancer screenin
Wow
By Dan Calabrese —— Bio and Archives--April 16, 2013
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
They really think thoughts like this in the Blue Cocoon. It's hard to imagine how they work themselves into such logical pretzels, but I bet we can do it. Andrew Rosenthal, editorial page editor of the New York Times, defends the paper's practice of basically ignoring the Gosnell trial while hyping incidents that reflect poorly on the anti-abortion side. He basically hues to the left-wing company like that Gosnell's crime really "highlights the need for safe, affordable and available women’s reproductive health care."
Read Full Article...
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy