No, Hillary, the Supreme Court should not be against the wealthy
We don't need Justices who share her attitude toward the law
By Herman Cain —— Bio and Archives--October 23, 2016
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
You probably didn’t hear much about it because all the media wanted to talk about was bad hombres and Donald Trump “not accepting the result” of the election, whatever that means. But during the third and final debate last week, Hillary Clinton made an astounding statement about the U.S. Supreme Court.
After Trump reiterated his position that his court appointments would interpret the Constitution as the founders intended, Hillary replied as follows:
“The Supreme Court should be on the side of the American people, not on the side of the wealthy and the powerful.”
Now I’m sure that a lot of people were nodding their heads when she said this. Of course! Who wouldn’t want to be on the side of “the people” instead of the wealthy and powerful?Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy