WhatFinger

Data, history & science refute NOAA’s claims

NOAA bastardizes science in Louisiana rain modeling study


Climate Depot's Marc Morano on new NOAA study: "No matter how hard federally funded climate activist scientists at NOAA try to bend and twist models and data to make it appear the invisible hand of 'global warming' has a role in almost every weather event, the facts refute their claims." Morano: "Studies show that rainfalls used to be longer and worse. Ironically, heavy rains used to be caused by 'global cooling' in the 1970s. NOAA's overuse of climate models to claim such nonsense should be audited. The scientists know better. But it appears a one day flashy headline on 'record' rains based on dubious models that contradict data, seems to be too enticing for them to pass up." Real Climate Science website's Tony Heller's analysis: NOAA rain modeling study ‘has no scientific basis, and ignores all available actual data’ – ‘Man-Made Modeling Abuse Increases The Odds Of NOAA Fraud’ - 'The NOAA study has no scientific basis, and ignores all available actual data. Software models can be written to produce any result the author wants to produce. They are not evidence of anything other than deep corruption at NOAA.' - 'There has been no increase in heavy rains in Lousiana.' -- More...
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored