On to SCOTUS? Virginia appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump's travel ban
Not because of anything in the law, but because of the judge's personal suspicions about the president's motives.
By Dan Calabrese —— Bio and Archives--May 26, 2017
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
It's come to this: The federal judiciary now believes it has to right to throw out perfectly legal actions that are within the president's authority, if in the personal opinions of the federal judges, the president might have had a motive they don't like. We're now making up the law as we go along:
The U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia on Thursday refused to reinstate President Donald Trump's temporary travel ban for six Muslim-majority nations, in another legal blow to the White House. A majority of judges on the appeals court, in a 10-3 decision, said they were "unconvinced" the travel order had more to do with national security concerns than a "Muslim ban."
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy