Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)

The debate surrounding Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)

By Lee Cary -- Bio and Archives--May 26,2020

American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article

---

Review of Part 3 Takeaways

• Dr. Deborah Birx said the CDC math on SARS-CoV-2 deaths was, at least, 25% exaggerated, and no one blinked.
• Remdesivir was eventually judged not only to be a "nothing burger," but a no-taste vegan patty that didn't satisfy hunger, as it failed field tests with patients. 
• The New England Journal of Medicine delivered a knockout blow to Gilead Sciences' attempt to breathe life into one of its failed drugs from the past. 
• Don't be surprised when the government scientists push a new candidate offering a symptom-mitigating drug for virus suffers.

The debate surrounding Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)

The debate of Remdesivir v. HCQ started on, or about, Friday, March 20, when Dr. Fauci stepped to the podium during a virus briefing to correct a favorable comment Trump made about HCQ. Fauci said: "You've got to be careful when you say 'fairly effective'. It (HCQ) was never done in a clinical trial…It was given to individuals and felt that maybe it worked."

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy

CFP Disqus Comments