SCOTUS opinion makes the case for print media resurgence
A Free Press needs to know how to operate in the analog world in order to sidestep encumbrances of the digital gulag for which it unwittingly signed up
By A. Dru Kristenev —— Bio and Archives--July 3, 2024
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
The 6-3 decision from SCOTUS on Murthy v. Missouri sidestepped the reality of government interference in what’s published on the internet for public consumption. Seeing Justice Coney-Barrett and fellows deny the original petitioners’ standing to make their claim of injury, it left the question of government applied censorship unanswered. With America First Legal releasing details of the Biden administration’s plan to deal with “domestic terrorism,” government hounding of conservatives, religionists, and veterans is still a concern.
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy