Two sides to the story related to two SCOTUS opinions
Intentional immoral actions taken for personal or political profit such as fraud, bribery, treason, murder cannot be protected by presidential immunity. Policy/regulation implemented at the whim of a president without legislative authority is not law
By A. Dru Kristenev —— Bio and Archives--July 3, 2024
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
Two opinions handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States this term have bearing on the crazy, yes, crazy rants of democrats suggesting that the Trump v. United States ruling could empower the sitting president to “off” his political opponent. Where did they get the ludicrous idea? From Justice Sotomayor’s dissent:
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy