When parents disagree about vaccination of their kids, who should win?
Canadian Justice R. T. Bennett got it right: the courts should NOT take judicial notice that the vaccines are "safe and effective." The health authorities are stating opinions, not facts.
By News on the Net -- Steve Kirsh—— Bio and Archives--March 1, 2023
| Comments | Back To Full Article
Check out this recent court decision from a Canadian judge. It explains why the courts should NOT take judicial notice of the opinions of health authorities (like most of them do) that the vaccines are “safe and effective.”
In this case, the parents disagree on whether their children should be vaccinated.
The father is red-pilled; the mom is blue-pilled.
All three kids are COVID-recovered.
Mom of course wants to vaccinate the kids. The Dad does not.
The judge has ruled that the opinion of the health authorities (“safe and effective”) should NOT be taken as fact because reasonable people don’t agree the health authorities are right. This is a huge shift from previous rulings which have gone along with the health authorities as the subject-matter experts. This judge isn’t buying it. -- More...
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy