After 3 years of calling for the impeachment of President Trump, the feckless Democrats have now latched onto a benign conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, as evidence that Trump committed an impeachable act. Does any sane, non-partisan person really think that President Trump has committed a high crime or misdemeanor, and therefore, should be impeached?
Well, that's what the Democrats are hanging their hats on and are putting the citizens of the United States through the divisive misuse of the impeachment process. What a disgrace!
Since the Mueller probe turned up no collusion (conspiracy) by Trump, to the chagrin of the Democrats who thought for sure that Mueller was going to give them fodder for impeachment, they are now looking for anything to tie around the neck of the president to justify their insane quest to throw Trump out of office.
So, what are the damning words that Trump supposedly said that would rise to an impeachable offense? You could classify the charges by the Democrats (and their flunkies in the media) as liars par excellence.
Let's examine what these lies are, by examining the words that Trump' actually said in the phone conversation. The Democrats, mainly Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Jerry Nadler, and other Democrats with TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), are claiming that Trump offered a "quid pro quo" to Zelensky. A critical reading of the conversation showed that nothing of value was offered, therefore, there was no "quid pro quo".
Next, they claimed that Trump asked for a favor to dig up "dirt" on Joe Biden and his son Hunter. What Trump was asking a favor for was for Zelensky, as the new president of Ukraine, to help in investigating attempts by the previous government to interfere in our 2016 election. There was no mention of Biden until 540 words later in the call. Another claim by the Democrats was that Trump threatened to withhold aid to the Ukraine unless Zelensky did us a favor. The fact is that Ukraine did not know that aid was put on hold by Trump until a month after the phone call. There was no "quid pro quo". The aid was released sometime in August, it had nothing to do with the conversation between Trump and Zelensky.
The so-called "whistle blower" (supposedly a CIA worker in the White House) had no first hand knowledge of what was said on the phone call. He reported only hearsay and gossip from others. Many of the charges he made in his charge were incorrect which the transcript showed when it was released, making what he said moot and irrelevaThe betting odds by the bookmakers in Las Vegas predict that Trump will win in 2020.nt.
Of course, to prove malfeasance by Trump, they claimed that he orchestrated a cover up. Are they kidding? What was the presentation to the public of the phone call transcript and the permission by Trump of his National Security Adviser and his emissary to Ukraine to testify before Congress? That's a cover up?
This whole exercise, by the Democrats, is nothing more than a "Kangaroo Court Inquiry", used to try to negate the will of the people and to overturn the election of a duly elected president, therefore, they continue this charade in hopes that this baseless charges will damage im in the eyes of the electorate. Even if the House votes for impeachment, the Senate will not convict him. This whole thing is a complete waste of time and money. They should all be ashamed of themselves for putting the country though this ..
The "fake news media" and their biased polls showing that Trump would lose to any of the Democrats running for president are just as reliable as the polls that showed Hillary Clinton winning in a landslide in 2016. The betting odds by the bookmakers in Las Vegas predict that Trump will win in 2020. I'll stick with the Las Vegas bookmakers not the biased press in determining the outcome of the next election, impeachment or no impeachment.
Hallelujah, 4 more years of Trump keeping America great!
After 3 years of calling for the impeachment of President Trump, the feckless Democrats have now latched onto a benign conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, as evidence that Trump committed an impeachable act. Does any sane, non-partisan person really think that President Trump has committed a high crime or misdemeanor, and therefore, should be impeached?
Well, that's what the Democrats are hanging their hats on and are putting the citizens of the United States through the divisive misuse of the impeachment process. What a disgrace!
