WhatFinger

Evidence Raises Suspicion of Cover-Up

Video Indicates U.S. Government Aware of Much Greater Volume of Gulf Gusher


By —— Bio and Archives--June 16, 2010

Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Some of the truth has been hiding in plain sight since May Day, at AL.com.  Visit the government at work, specifically the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce (NOAA) meeting in “Warroom 1.”  They are intently collecting data on what is apparently the 22nd, 23rd, or 24th of April.  They are scientists for an United States government which refused massive clean-up help from foreign sources. then, and refuses such help now—an U.S. government which seems to have lied to us, all this time. Note the following:

.

At the 3 minute mark in the video and at 3m:17s, see what one member of this NOAA meeting has scrawled in his notebook: “53 to 110 K [brrel?].”

At 6 minutes 35 seconds, the man on the phone says, “I’ve heard two different estimates on, some’n, far as uh, between sixty-five and a hundred thousand barrels a day.”

Then, see what is written, back at the War Room’s white board (frozen in time, below).  Those are numbers much, much higher than the story they have given the public, then or now.

Last Wednesday evening, June 9th, I interviewed Mark Proegler, Director of Climate Energy Policy for BP plc, working for Deepwater Horizon Unified Command.  He recounted to me that the early, officially released estimate of the rate of the leak was 5,000 barrels per day.  Then, he said, the U.S. government put together two technical groups to assess the flow and they performed numerous tests.  Their two results, according to the government, were between 12,000 and 19,000 barrels per day from one group and between 12,000 to 25,000 barrels per day from the other.  At the time of this article’s release, the latest official estimate by the government I have found was issued on June 10th: from 20,000 to 40,000 barrels per day.

Compare these early numbers with the evidence discussed here: 65,000 to 100,000 barrels per day on the telephone call, 64,000 to 110,000 barrels per day on the whiteboard, and 53,000 to 110,000, in the notebook.  Look for anything written around those numbers in the video.  Do you see words such as “could eventually become?”  I do not.  The white board prefaces its numbers with terse immediacy: “estim.”  Further, by that point, they had noted a “twelve mile long slick of emulsified oil,” visible by aircraft.

The only part of this May 1st report by Ben Raines which seems at odds with observable facts is its title, in its use of the words, “potential for.”  No, these appear to be concurrent estimates of the actual oil being blasted out of that orifice in April, not analyses of potentials.

Video Shows Federal Officials Knew Quickly of Potential for Massive Oil Flow in Gulf Spill

by Ben Raines, Birmingham Press-Register, 5/1/2010

Video from NOAA site shows officials knew quickly of potential for massive oil flow

A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration video, shot as officials coordinated response to the Deepwater Horizon disaster, shows that federal officials almost immediately worried that the oil well could leak up to 110,000 barrels per day, or 4.6 million gallons.

The video appears on a federal Web site.

It was filmed in Seattle, at NOAA’s Western Regional Center, as scientists and federal officials in Seattle, Houston and New Orleans engaged in telephone conferences, according to a companion document on the Web site.

You can read this at it’s original site, published May 1st, at AL.com


Does anyone reading this believe that BP is the problem in allowing this crisis to become more “significant,” the word Rahm Emanuel used in his famous quote, “You never want a significant crisis to go to waste?” Is this administration allowing this disaster to worsen, in order to push for Cap and Trade law and a Climate Change Treaty? Are they actually fostering this horrific calamity, to build the coffers of investors in the Chicago Climate Exchange, while further transferring America’s wealth to foreign nations and instituting global government over the sovereign United States of America (as reported here)? Is this effectively a false-flag attack upon this nation, blamed on an oil-rich “capitalist” corporation?

Follow the money, the means, and the ends, and see if you find extortion and globalist Marxofascism. As guest contributor, CJ affirmed last week, we need an honest and comprehensive investigation of this—a criminal, RICO investigation which must include members of the United States Government. - AW


CFPSubcribe

Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Arlen Williams -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Arlen Williams has been an organizer of electoral action in Illinois and Wisconsin, in addition to a career in technology sales. Arlen’s writing usually addresses politics, critical world events, and media review.


Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: