WhatFinger

The implications of these new model projections are staggering. Not in what they say about the coronavirus, but what they in reveal about the truth of modelling and those who promote and rely on them

Are You Relieved New Second Wave Models No Longer Support Worst-Case Scenarios? Don’t Be



Are You Relieved New Second Wave Models No Longer Support Worst-Case Scenarios?Thanks to Global News and other mainstream sources, informed citizens are relieved to know that updated models indicate Ontario will not suffer through the 2nd Wave’s worst-case scenario. The hopeful report begins with these three sentences and a link to a newsletter.
“New modelling shows Ontario appears to be moving away from the worst-case scenario during the second wave of COVID-19. New projections suggested the growth of the pandemic is slowing even though community spread of the virus continues. Health officials said continuing to adopt targeted measures that account for regional variations will be important in trying to contain the spread of the virus. [ Sign up for our Health IQ newsletter for the latest coronavirus updates ]”
To be fair to Global News, I didn’t read past the link in their report and didn’t click the link because, well, you’ll see. First, let’s back up a moment to set the stage for the logical analysis of the first two statements in the Global report.

Second wave crashes the party

Concerns about the impact of the “killer” viruses’ return began months ago, with Premier Doug Ford expressing his anxieties to CTV on July 10, 2020. On July 28, CTV cited an expert who feared the impact of COVID action would harm the survivability of small businesses. On September 23, CTV stressed the growing fears of a second wave and a Toronto blog confidently asserted the reality of the second wave and what the city was doing to stop it. The number of second wave stories is near limitless, and in September they began repeating the model “fact” the second wave would peak in October. (In other words, do something now before it’s too late!) Reports about just how bad the second wave would be flooded the landscape. On September 28, CTV warned of the second wave’s horrific potential and on October 1, the CBC ratcheted up those fears by turning the second wave into an even deadlier tsunami. As October’s end neared, the media’s COVID narrative needed to cover for the fact that the deadly tsunami had been miraculously avoided. Enter the Global News report revealing that new modelling showed Ontarians would not suffer the worst of the worst-case projections. Whew, did Ontario catch a break or what?

Support Canada Free Press

Donate

Models, Frodels

In the first statement, “new modelling” indicates Ontario won’t be hit with the worst-case scenario. OK, but what does that say about earlier COVID-19 models that projected those scenarios? That’s right, they were WRONG. The old and the new models project different outcomes, so both can’t be correct. In fact, all prior COVID-19 models must be wrong, otherwise they wouldn’t need to continually update them to try to match COVID reality. The “New projections” statement completely destroys the “Stop The Spread” narrative that has run from the beginning of this political hoax. The sentence admits that the causal link between the spread of the virus and the deadly pandemic doesn’t exist. It explicitly separates the spread of the virus from the growth of the pandemic: Growth down and spread up. So then, what is the point of stopping the spread, to grow the pandemic? For four months or more, people have been bombarded with second wave stories that stoked irrational fears of the killer’s return. Even worse, by pumping that fear, the media also stimulated rational fears of further lockdowns that do nothing but spread misery and poverty. In other words, the media doubled the fear mongering in second wave reporting. (Because they care) Now new models show the worst-case has been avoided, and people have finally caught a break. Here is the thing, COVID reality didn’t change over those months. The only thing that changed was model projections. The looming destruction predicted by earlier model projections was averted solely by new model projections. The new models didn’t save anyone, they simply alleviated fake model fears that should never have existed in the first place.

The conclusions are harsh

The conclusions are harsh. The media’s use of frodel projections to purposely hype second wave fears caused unnecessary and widespread emotional distress. The reporting did that, not COVID. The extreme fear was unwarranted, but it was purposely and abusively spread regardless. Politically, our freedoms are now controlled by modellers, right? It is the models, not the politicians, that tell us when to mask up, quarantine, distance, and stay home. Models like those that projected 2.2 million US deaths drive the delusional political response. The thing to fear is the next frodel that projects “WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!” because it means our political leaders will leap at the opportunity to save us from the fake fear, even if that means spreading real poverty. It’s well past time to demand politicians “Stop The Spread – of Poverty”. You know you’re in trouble when a t-shirt slogan brings more wisdom to the discussion than the entire media has all year. COVID-19: crime of the century says an international group of doctors. They call themselves the “Doctors of Enlightenment” and claim to represent a group of more than 1000 doctors world-wide. They pull zero punches when they call COVID-19 the crime of the century, but they don’t do so blindly, they point fingers and provide evidence as well.

Subscribe

Covid - The Crime of the Century



They go beyond calling the world’s COVID response a scam to outright calling it a crime. If so, it means Canada’s media, and their puppet politicians like Trudeau, Ford, and Kenney, are involved in horrific crimes against us! That is the scale of COVID deceit we’ve been subjected to and it will stain our leader’s legacy for eternity. It also means all COVID regulations are unnecessary, including distancing and masks. The abuse needs to end. Their conclusions match that of my Bias And Deceit analysis, which warned months ago that the models HAD to be fake because they knew nothing at the time. They were guaranteed to be wrong, and all that was left to determine was, how wrong? And now we know. Crime of the century wrong.

View Comments

Mark Gray——

Mark Gray hails from the Kirkland Lake, Ontario area and has spent over 30 years as an Analyst/Developer in Big IT, mostly in Calgary’s Oil-And-Gas Sector. Creator of an non-partisan, analytical methodology that seeks out and identifies Bias and Deceit embedded in weaponized information.


Sponsored