Carbon Emission Futures Have Tanked And What Does It Mean?
Fortunately, as with Communism in the late 1980s, our endless experiment of in-your-face and in-your-wallet government can be reformed
Bob Hoye , Bio and Archives--March 29, 2020
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
With all the excitement about controlling the climate, Carbon Emission Futures rallied strongly to $27 in December. And have dropped to $15. Obviously, the peak and plunge has been tied to the dramatic collapse of the "Everything Bubble". Stocks, bonds and commodities have seriously slumped in what could be a weakening global economy. Should this continue, there will not be enough money to fund bureaucratic ambition such as "managing" the temperature of the nearest planet.
Carbon dioxide: A trace gas essential to all life
In which, case it could be the end of Climate Emissions as today’s equivalent of Sixteenth Century "indulgences". The hype has just been a front for control freaks, and the price has soared and slumped before. This one could end the nonsense of trading unique man-made molecules of carbon dioxide. Otherwise known as a trace gas essential to all life. The last rally was with all the hype going into the celebrated "Paris Agreement" held in the middle of December 2015. With this, "Carbon’s" price topped at $8.65 and then slumped to $4.00 with most commodities into 2016. And with what has been the greatest "Everything Bubble" in history, it soared to $27 a couple of months ago. In retrospect, it was clearly an outstanding peak. The high of $27 compares to $28 reached with the celebrated "Copenhagen Accord" in 2009. This was also part of that big boom in stocks and commodities. "Carbon" eventually plunged to $3.50. And the recent decline to $15 amounts to a 47 percent. Obviously not a liquid market. Carbon Emissions Futures - Dec 20In a great financial boom everybody gets busy, with far too many becoming reckless. Unfortunately, this includes governments breaking from the traditions of constitutional limits. And one of the promotions has been the elimination of risk, which has required a massive intrusion into too many aspects of ordinary life. One long-running intrusion has been the notion that a central bank is needed to "manage" the economy and within this to prevent "bad things" from happening. Ironically, this was the tout in 2007 and as far back as 1929. Both were followed by severe contractions. The problem has been that with a quasi-government agency assuring there is no risk, investors abandoned preparing for risk which exaggerated the "Everything Bubble". All resting upon the notion that with the Fed, nothing could go wrong. And all past bubbles have run to speculative exhaustion and in collapsing have been followed by severe contractions. If the past continues to guide, the hardships of increasing unemployment could soon become an issue. The other ambition has shown unprecedented audacity. And that has been the notion that by "managing" the temperature of the nearest planet "bad things" can be prevented. This one has been preposterous. Claiming that for the first time since critters became widespread on our uniquely hospitable planet, a warming trend would be harmful to life. Think back to when Earth was totally covered in ice--called "Snowball Earth".
The future for Carbon Emission Futures is the dustbin of history
Of course, both have been reckless promotions and with a naturally occurring contraction the Left could have a suddenly different concern. And as it has shown, it can handle only one hysteria at a time. Lately, there has been no major anxieties about "Global Cooling" that prevailed in the early 1970s. "Ozone Holes" are no longer on "News at Eleven". And in 1995, the EPA declared that radon gas was a worse threat than pesticides and hazardous waste. U.S. deaths were estimated at 14,000 per year ("The Freeman", March 1995). Thankfully, most have forgotten about the dreadful scare of "Alar" on apples. The following from GWPF conveys the rapid change in priorities. And as the global financial and economic contraction extends, there will be little money for the Left’s ambition to establish even more authoritarian government. A growing number of ordinary people will have had enough intrusion and its cost. A revival of common sense is possible. It is best to be clear and use a definition of an authoritarian system from physics: That which is not compulsory is prohibited. This has been the mojo of every political system, right down to school boards. Fortunately, as with Communism in the late 1980s, our endless experiment of in-your-face and in-your-wallet government can be reformed. The future for Carbon Emission Futures is the dustbin of history.View Comments
Bob Hoye——Bio and Archives
Bob Hoye (BobHoye.com) has been researching investments for decades, which eventually included the history of financial and political markets. He considers now to be the most fascinating time for both since the Great Reformation of the 1600s. Bob casts a caustic eye on all promotions and, having a degree in geophysics, is severely critical of the audacity that a committee can “manage” not just the economy, but also the temperature of the nearest planet. He has had articles published in major financial journals and, as a speaker, has amused assemblies in a number of cities, from London to Zurich to Tokyo.