How hostile the Old Media is toward tax cuts, spending cuts, and making government accountable and Constitutionally justifiable
Warner Todd Huston , Bio and Archives--April 19, 2011
American Politics, News | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
First of all we're not talking about cutting taxes. We're just not agreeing with the President's tax increases. I guess that's the new definition of tax cuts. We're saying keep tax rates where they are right now. Get rid of all those loopholes and deductions, which by the way, are mostly enjoyed by wealthy people so you can lower tax rates.This, Ryan explained, even fits with the recommendations from Obama's own fiscal commission, recommendations that Democrats supported only a year ago. Schieffer was having none of it, though. The aging newser insisted that soaking the rich would solve everything.
I guess the part that I don't quite understand -- and I take your proposal to be a serious one -- but the part I don't understand is if the country is going bankrupt, if the country needs to borrow 40 cents of every dollar that it spends, how do you help that by reducing the amount of taxes that the richest people in the country pay? It would be seem to me that's where you get revenue. How do you justify that?You have to hear the exasperation in Schieffer’s voice. Once you do you’ll understand that he isn’t just being a good journalist forcing the hard questions on his subject. He truly believes the class warfare pap he is spewing. It is clear that Schieffer is wholly blinded to the simple fact that government is illicitly spending many times more than it takes in and that the solution is neither “borrowing 40 cents of every dollar that it spends” nor hiking taxes to soak the rich. It is telling that cutting federal spending seemed to be a concept that Schieffer rejected outright as a possible solution to what ails our federal budget. As I said, this all fits with the class warfare agenda of the left. In fact, it can be phrased as a moral argument. This excerpt from Slaying Leviathan: The Moral Case for Tax Reform by Leslie Carbone helps draw that distinction.
The progressive tax system is based on envy, the “resentful awareness of an advantage enjoyed by another joined with a desire to possess the same advantage.” … the modern U.S. tax code was imposed in response to so-called progressives agitating against the natural inequality in wealth distribution. Basing public policy on envy teaches people to nurture their natural tendency toward this vice, instead of to resist and rise above it. It encourages everyone to think himself a victim and perpetuates resentment because there will always be something to envy.If that isn't a perfect explication of the left's class warfare agenda, what is? And if this episode of Face the Nation is any indication, Bob Schieffer is pleased to be a vehement class warrior hoping to keep the green monster of envy roiling us all.
View Comments
Warner Todd Huston’s thoughtful commentary, sometimes irreverent often historically based, is featured on many websites such as Breitbart.com, among many, many others. He has also written for several history magazines, has appeared on numerous TV and radio shows.
He is also the owner and operator of Publius’ Forum.