WhatFinger

House effort to repeal the ban on incandescents

CFLs burn out in California?

By Steve Milloy ——--January 20, 2011

Global Warming-Energy-Environment | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

California utility PG&E Corp. has just learned something about CFLs — they don't work as well as touted. According to a report in today's Wall Street Journal, PG&E's $92 million rebate program for CFL usage during 2006-2008 saved 73% less energy than originally projected by PG&E:
One hitch was the compact-fluorescent burnout rate. When PG&E began its 2006-2008 program, it figured the useful life of each bulb would be 9.4 years. Now, with experience, it has cut the estimate to 6.3 years, which limits the energy savings. Field tests show higher burnout rates in certain locations, such as bathrooms and in recessed lighting. Turning them on and off a lot also appears to impair longevity. [Emphasis added]
Combined with their inherent mercurial hypocrisy, this new information should add urgency to the House effort to repeal the ban on incandescents.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate
Subscribe

View Comments
Steve Milloy——

Steve Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and GreenHellBlog.com and is the author of Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them

Older articles by Steve Milloy

VIEW Comments

Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->