WhatFinger

MLI COMMENTARY BY SEAN SPEER

DEFICIT DEBATE CLOUDING THE BIG PICTURE ON GOVERNMENT SPENDING:


By —— Bio and Archives--February 14, 2019

Canadian News, Politics, Opinion | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

OTTAWA, ON (February 14, 2019):  A recent series of speeches, articles, and debates is provoking big questions about deficits and debt. Do they matter? Should we care? Has the past political emphasis on balancing the budget been misguided?

A new commentary paper by MLI Munk Senior Fellow Sean Speer titled Deficits, Debt, and the Right Path for Fiscal Policy: A Framework for Smaller Government aims to answer these questions as we approach the upcoming federal budget.

.

The commentary contends that those voices who dismiss deficits and debt neglect real risks – including the cost of interest payments on the debt, the potential effects of long-term fiscal challenges such as aging demographics, and the political tendency for small, short-term deficits to evolve into large, long-term deficits.

But while deficit defenders may understate these risks, deficit critics can become overly fixated on deficits and debt and neglect the real problem which is profligate spending and big government.

“[P]roponents of smaller government can lack the self-confidence to advance their real argument,” notes Speer. “Criticizing an ongoing deficit or rising debt is easier and safer than arguing for a reduction in the size and scope of government.”

This is to say that political debates about deficits and debt risk failing to address the more fundamental questions about the right size and scope of government and how to make decisions about the utility of government spending.

Speer thus argues that we need a more “textured” fiscal debate about the right size and scope of government and an evidence-based plan to make judgments about what government spending is justified, what spending should be reformed, and what spending ought to be eliminated.

The commentary presents a framework to evaluate government spending that revolves around a few key principles and approaches:

  • Using clearer definitions when determining if and how government intervention is justified;
  • Codifying fiscal rules that raise the political threshold for governments that choose to deviate from useful norms like balanced budgets;
  • Providing annualized reviews of government spending using clear and transparent criteria to eliminate unjustified or inefficient public spending;
  • Developing a systemic process to devolve different government activities and functions to civil society;
  • Drawing on the concept of the “marginal cost of public funds” to evaluate whether government spending is justified considering the economic costs associated with raising the tax revenues to pay for it.

“The goal here is to help arm those who criticize budgetary deficits as a proxy for costly and ineffective public spending with the tools to better target their attention and focus,” explains Speer, arguing that such work can “in turn make progress on reducing the size and scope of government.”

To learn more about why the government may be too large and why the debates around debts and deficits may be missing the point, check out Sean Speer’s latest commentary.

Sean Speer is a Munk Senior Fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. He previously served in different roles for the federal government including as senior economic advisor to the Prime Minister and director of policy to the Minister of Finance.

For more information, please contact:

Brett Byers-Lane
Communications and Digital Media Manager


CFPSubcribe

Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Macdonald Laurier Institute -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Canada’s only truly national public policy think tank based in Ottawa. MLI is rigorously independent and non-partisan, as symbolized by its name. Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir Wilfrid Laurier were two outstanding and long-serving former prime ministers who represent the best of Canada’s distinguished political tradition. A Tory and a Grit, an English-speaker and a French-speaker, each of them championed the values that led to the creation of Canada and its emergence as one of the world’s leading democracies and a place where people may live in peace and freedom under the rule of law.


Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: