Democrats and Gov. Polis are hazardous to Colorado Freedom

The focus upon the recall of Gov. Jared Polis may or may not be taken seriously by the leadership of either the “Democratic” Party or the Republican Party, but the grassroots effort of thousands of good people from Colorado is a serious matter. Although the effort has been poorly reported on with confusing information or distorted information from the mainstream media outlets, it should be taken seriously if a healthy future of the people of Colorado is a concern of the media. But in actuality, the recall effort has been resisted by the state’s mainstream media outlets. It has been practically dismissed by the Democrat power structure. It has been virtually ignored, or not even addressed by state GOP leadership. Yet, the effort did not disappear - did not die away - despite the odds.

National Popular Vote measure implies something good, it is actually an insidious way to render impotent the votes of the more rural states across the United States -- Colorado included

The simple question would be: Why? One possible answer may be that the good people of Colorado are waking up to take action themselves to determine the political future of their state. In the vacuum of leadership, it is inevitable that leaders stand up based on necessity. Several underlying concerns fuel the recall effort, but perhaps one of the greatest issues is that Gov. Polis and the Democrat legislators control the state, and have knowingly endorsed a collective pact of the “Democratic” National Committee to essentially nullify the votes of the people of Colorado. Knowing the political implications of the National Popular Vote effort, essentially intended to destroy the Electoral College, the Democrats’ true intent is a one-Party system of control. It may be doubtful whether regular, law-abiding citizens and trusting people can comprehend the long-term political implications of the National Popular Vote effort as it spreads across the country. Simply put, the remedy for absolutist, power-hungry, Democrats is to destroy the foundation that permitted Trump to win the election: the Electoral College. If the Electoral College is eliminated from the general elections, states like Colorado with lower populations, electoral minorities, will have their votes nullified by major population states like California and New York. The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College to protect the states with fewer inhabitants from domination over them by the states with greater populations. It was also one of the reasons for creating the House of Representatives so there would be fairness of representation in the new government. Although the innocuous-sounding name of the National Popular Vote measure implies something good, it is actually an insidious way to render impotent the votes of the more rural states across the United States -- Colorado included. Despite seeming to align with the true will of the people for the national election of a president, it takes away the value of voting from the residents of the lower population states. This undermines the underlying purpose of state-identity and integrity. It aligns with the national “Democratic” Party effort to even destroy boundaries and borders which define the identity and authority of the nation as a whole.

---

The Democrats did not regard the Indian people as human beings and they certainly did not regard the African slaves as people

Is such a plan in play, and really possible, or just some far-fetched conspiracy theory? Only time would prove the truth. But a quick look at history can help to see whether it is possible. One big problem is that many American citizens do not know well their own history because it is not taught well in schools. Nevertheless, the “Democratic” Party was founded by Andrew Jackson and his cohorts in 1828, primarily in direct relation to his loss of the presidential election of 1824. Jackson easily defeated John Quincy Adams in the election that year, after he swore to do everything possible to resist Adams while he was president and to beat him in the ensuing election. Although most decent Americans are not students of history, and willingly show basic trust in the “American Way,” perception is not always reality. How the Jacksonian Democrats came to power, and what they did with it afterward, is instructive. National electoral laws were changed in the period from 1824 - 1828, and for the first time, those age-eligible white males who did not own property were allowed to vote by law. This effort was coupled with the formation of Jackson’s “Democratic” Party. It was a very popular measure. It set historical precedent in American political history because non-landowning white males of age could vote. It was a good development for the people, but paved a path of deviation from protection of minorities. A study of the history behind the Indian Removal Act demonstrates how democracy can turn evil and why the Founders did not construct a government based upon democracy. It appears good in theory, but it is capable of uncontrolled or unregulated domination over minorities in a population. A study of the history behind slavery demonstrates how democracy can operate in a closed and entrenched system of domination over minorities. The Democrats did not regard the Indian people as human beings and they certainly did not regard the African slaves as people. They spread this disease of domination over human beings throughout the United States over many decades. And, if it were not for the American Civil War, their popular “democracy” would have consumed the U.S.

---

Support Canada Free Press

---

But in a nutshell, the Civil War was the dramatic rejection by one political party of the outcome of the 1860 election, after the Democrats swore to do everything possible to resist Lincoln - even if it meant committing treason by unilaterally ripping up the U.S. Constitution, and creating their own government. The Democrats had already established a closed, one-party system in the South, which controlled the southern media and the majority of people’s voting rights. After they were defeated in the war, party leaders were able to adapt and to sustain a system of absolute control within southern states after Reconstruction. The purpose behind the Civil Rights effort was to take this white power structure down. It was a challenge to the Confederate-minded elitists and that entrenched power in the southern states to provide the civil rights (primarily voting rights) to which the black population was entitled. People should realize that this system persisted up until the 1960s and 1970s before it was again broken by federal intervention. The purpose of the movement was to restore the principles upon which the nation was founded. Today, despite the public relations spin of a party that had earned the distrust of the majority of Americans in a post-Civil War era, Democrat leadership is again showing its true colors. Leaders of the "Democratic” Party have perfected limiting or undermining the vote to select people in the past century. One needs to ask: Does the Democrat’s primary election of Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders in 2016 indicate a genuine election or the appearance of an election? Also, even though only candidate Donald Trump was forced to publicly pledge that he would honor the outcome of the 2016 general election, are Democrats not held to the same standard? According to their behavior, which is disguised as contempt for the political opposition, there exists a double standard.

---

Trump’s unexpected popularity and subsequent election are indicative of a new challenge for the Democrats. At best he will only be elected for one more term, but the Democrats seem to believe that if they can eliminate the Electoral College, they could eliminate the possibility of Trump being re-elected. Changes to the rules do work. Democrat-controlled one-party state systems are the ideal, and if achieved, all their problems would be over. A state-by-state promotion of “popular elections” through the National Popular Vote effort advances across the country. It represents a new twist on the old plan of controlling states through a one-party state system. It has been done before in the United States. The outcome was horrific. What does all this have to do with Colorado? This has a great deal to do with Colorado. Closed one-party dominated states exist now - Colorado has become one of them. Colorado’s one Party has signed onto the National Popular Vote pact. Unfortunately, the stakes are much higher now than simply for one state being dominated by a single political party (which, by the way turns into tyranny). If people are paying attention, the new mantra of the “Democratic” Party portrays all the promises of Socialism. This is because the ideology contains the seeds for the development of a system of slavery over multiple states. The truth is there for anyone to see -- implementation of the ideology into a national slavery is not simply conjecture -- it is historical fact. The success of this recall effort is dependent upon the good people of Colorado. There are many genuine implications of the National Popular Vote movement. Colorado’s future, and possibly the future of the Republic may depend upon American citizens being willing to stand up to insidious plans hatched by the new “Democratic”- Socialist Party, which is now not even pretending to be democratic. How many people has this party trampled upon in the process of efforts to increase its political power over a people? Socialism, in its advanced stages of Communism, also has its own history of destruction. The good people of Colorado can draw the line at this point in time, to stop such insanity - no matter the public appearances. The good people of Colorado have their future in their own hands at this point; history will reveal the wisdom or the weakness of their ways.