WhatFinger

Editing the Wikipedia proves story that US and Iran cooperated on Lockerbie


By News on the Net ——--October 2, 2010

Letters to the Editor | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


The big conspiracy theory that is missing from the Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories page is the one that says "the US and Iran co-operated to bring down a US aircraft in revenge for the downing of IR-655 and ensure that HW Bush was shoed into the white House.

But if you attempt to change the Wikipedia to include the possibility of this it is swiftly reverted. Now, by definition a conspiracy theory is wrong, and the wackier a conspiracy theory is the better, because a conspiracy theory is by definition not the truth. But if there is such a conspiracy theory so wacky that somebody does not like it, and they continually revert it, then probably it is not a conspiracy theory at all, but somewhere near the TRUTH. I have now had 5 reversions of the Wikipedia. This cannot be a random or unconnected occurrence. Change a detail on any other conspiracy theory (such a sputting in the agae of Talb at the time of the bombing), and it will probably survive, but mention Iran and the US together and it is reverted. Having had my rather complicated alteration to the Wikipedia in Hungarian about a deal between Iran and US reverted. It was done with Google translate and was long and rather complicated and the language was probably none to good, I put a much simpler reference to the deal in the Czech wikipedia in Czech, to see what happened. It, too, has been reverted. Now I don't know whether they are simply checking for edits in Pan Am 103 articles or they have tracked my IP address, which is static. I'll try again with a changing IP address. This confirms to me if nothing else does that there is a widespread plot out there to prevent any story that mentions a deal between Iran and the US in the same breath. It's ongoing, and it uses CIA stooges like Bert Strossberg to do its dirty work. Some people who were in on the CIA plot are apparently benefiting from this cover-up though they left the CIA in disputed circumstances in the reign of GW Bush. I have proved to my satisfaction if no-one else's that the cover-up is about the US and Iran, that the CIA do not might people banging on about the evidence in the Lockerbie trail or saying Megrahi and Liby re not guilty, or going on about radhaz, PFLGP GC or PPSF, Talb or Nidal, South African theory or anything else, but a theory like mine seems to make them PANC. Charles

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

News on the Net——

News from around the world


Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->