The authors of the confederation have conceded:
“No formal confederations exist today, and the few states that call themselves a "confederation" are in fact federations” (p.91)
Yet this pie in the sky, vague and nebulous confederation proposal has been deemed significant enough for Guterres to give it his endorsement.
Guterres’ spokesman Stephane Dujarric
said after the February 12th meeting:
“The secretary-general received [former Israeli justice minister] Yossi Beilin and [former Palestinian negotiator] Hiba Husseini, who presented him with their report on the ‘Holy Land Confederation’ process ... He thanked them for their useful contribution to try and achieve a lasting solution to the conflict,”
The meeting with Guterres lasted just 40 minutes and included four of Guterres’ advisers. Guterres
reportedly said the plan could perhaps help revive the peace process - expressing regret at the absence of negotiations.
Beilin
reportedly said he asked Guterres if the confederation plan could be included in Guterres’ talking points with leaders in the region and if Guterres could help the group use the UN platform for debates and discourse on the confederation:
“He [Guterres] promised that in his talks with his interlocutors, as he said, he will raise this option of a confederation,” Beilin said, adding that separately, “for the first time after many years, [Guterres said] he can have a dialogue with the Israeli government.”
There is another – and far better - alternative plan waiting in the wings to revive the peace process and get negotiations started: