WhatFinger

Defense of the indefensible: Joe Biden for president

Harris Versus Pence Versus Trump



Just finished watching the 2020 Vice Presidential candidate debate. Senator Harris showed the burden of defending a semi conscious racist playing the role of "anti racist" liberal White Savior. Despite her credentials as a prosecutor and state Attorney General, she failed to make her case. But given the person she had to defend, not surprising.
Telling the Vice President of the United States, "I'm speaking" wasn't a qualifier for being a heartbeat away from the presidency. It simply showed the shallowness of a debate strategy catering to modern fringe feminists and "Sista Girl" Black women used to talking over emasculated men. Vice President Pence politely but firmly proved he wasn't a beta male. Her defense of fracking may cost anti-gas purist votes among leftists thinking both she and Joe Biden are nefarious neo liberals seeking to avoid looking too progressive while needing that very vote to win. I noted she referred to herself as a Black woman, not Indian nor even biracial in a strategic appeal to Democrats most active swing vote Black women. This is where graduating from a leading HBCU (Historically Black College and University) and pledging a historically Black sorority, at its national founding chapter, are vital to motivating college educated Black voters hostile to Biden's bigotry. It's a waste of the Senator's talents and America-loving Americans time listening to a defense of the indefensible: Joe Biden for president. That was my take away from Harris verses Pence verses Trump.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Nadra Enzi—— "Nadra Enzi aka Cap Black is a contributor to Canada Free Press, a security writer on touchy topics; security advisor/founder of Borrow A Brother volunteer safety escorts for female friends concerned about carjackings robbery and sexual assault. $realbrocap on Cash App."

Sponsored