Hillary's Inconvenient Truth

Well thank God, FBI Director, James Comey came out and indicted Hillary Clinton. Even though it's not his job, Comey threw the book at her, leveled charges, found her guilty, and by way of political damage, sentenced her. Yeah, yeah, I know, Comey didn't technically indict Hillary and he passed on prosecutorial follow-up but per dictionary.com, the definition of indict is: to charge with an offense or crime; accuse of wrongdoing; castigate; criticize: Well Comey certainly charged Hillary with offenses and crimes, clearly accused her of wrongdoing, and boy, did he ever castigate her.

For anyone who missed the public flogging, here's the highlights. Comey said the FBI found emails with classifications as high as Top Secret/Special Access on Hillary's private server. He also said emails were marked classified when sent and received. Now that statement flat-out nails Hillary for lying to Congress when she said, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Oops, wrong Clinton. What Hillary said was, "I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received." How's that for an in-your-face-lie. Comey went on to say that anyone with a brain would know not to store classified information on a personal server and that the whole 'gang who can't shoot straight' was "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

---

The laundry list went on, irregularities, regulatory infractions, and outright crimes. As Comey neared the end of his summary, America waited breathlessly to hear the punch line, a recommendation for indictment. But then, déjå vu, it was OJ Simpson all over again. Yes, the prosecution laid out a mountain of irrefutable evidence but then, like the Simpson jury, Comey abdicated, let her off the hook. Well, no use crying over spilled milk, on to the Congressional hearings. So Comey shows up, is sworn in and gives his 'glad to be here' speech. Questioning begins at least for Republicans. Democrats whined about meanie Republicans and incited further racial violence. But I have to say, this inquiry got interesting when James Comey repeatedly implied that Hillary Clinton is mentally challenged. In the continuing saga of innocence by ignorance, Director Comey made the following remark: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is not as "technically sophisticated" as "people would assume about somebody with that background." Say what? Did he just say that Hillary's too dumb to understand the classification system? We had a woman for four years in a top government position who was supposed to manage our world presence who isn't technically savvy enough to manage her own email? But then that might explain how she screwed up the entire Middle East.

---

Support Canada Free Press

---

But the real zinger came later in an exchange between Rep. Mark Meadows (RNC) and Director Comey. Rep. Meadows asked Comey, "So a reasonable person who has been a senator, a secretary of state, a first lady, wouldn't a reasonable person know that that was a classified marking?" Comey replied, "Yeah, before this investigation, I probably would have said yes. I'm not so sure. I don't find it incredible," - Translation: I'd have said yes before I witnessed this cluster firsthand. Now nothing would surprise me. Now Comey couldn't officially cite stupidity as Hillary's excuse for her crimes because he's not psyched about working at Wendy's. So when nailed down, Comey repeated Hillary's (ok, just let me say it) stupid excuse of convenience. But how is a private server more convenient, the server's transparent to the user. What's more convenient about a personal server? Pretty obvious if you stop to think of it. Those irritating passwords for one thing, gotta have a capital letter, lower case letter, and number. The thing has to be x number of characters and can't be the same password you've used any time since high school. Poor Hillary, I mean, who thinks this stuff up? And how is Hillary supposed to carry an iPhone and a blackberry, like how will she know which one's ringing? Then there's those stupid passwords again, hard enough to remember one much less two and the security freaks get all bent out of shape over post-it notes. As for the obstruction of justice charge, don't be ridiculous. Hillary had no clue which emails her lawyers handed over to the Benghazi committee. She just let her lawyers run with the whole sort thing as a matter of convenience. And make no mistake, Hillary was shocked, shocked to find over 30,000 emails were deleted. Then for her lawyers to use that hard drive platter thingy for target practice, someone's going to answer for that. Of course the truth is, Hillary didn't go off the grid for convenience. As a nod to Hillary, our technically challenged friend, off the grid is: Free from governmental observation or control; not traceable through any means of commerce or communication that could be linked to one's identity. Yep, that says it all. Hillary wanted to conduct business in private the same way the Godfather, Don Corleone conducts business. Hillary didn't want the government looking over her shoulder and sure didn't want the American people to get wind of her negotiations. Be assured that among those 30,000 deleted emails were documents proving quid pro quo, requests only a high-ranking official like say Secretary of State could accommodate. And more than likely, you'd find evidence that the Middle East wasn't just a screw-up. We never had a chance, America. The countries that Hillary's in bed with are rich beyond belief. Hillary laughs at little old ladies sending their candidate $20 because she's raking in millions, maybe billions if anyone ever decides to track down her off-shore accounts. It would take over seven million little old ladies, steel workers, or coal miners with their $20 contributions to equal the $145 million dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation by those who sold off a major chunk of America to Russia, 20% of existing U.S. uranium production, and 50% of potential reserves. Yes, you read it right, they're now literally selling America, auctioning off our precious resources. This is just one instance of Hillary selling access as Secretary of State. I can't imagine what she's pulling in now that she has a shot at the Presidency. I know, you're sick of hearing about Hillary's scandals. After all, it's been decades. And you're turned off by the political bickering, the name-calling, and accusations. All that's in a different universe of politics and spin, not your world. But ask yourself this, if you're interviewing a nanny and it comes to your attention that this particular candidate has been lying to your face since day one, would you still take her on her word? If you have proof that this woman, in a previous position, endangered children entrusted to her through gross negligence, would you feel comfortable leaving your own children in her care. And if you found out this candidate who had access to her employer's alarm codes and schedules, had knowledge of a bountiful cache of jewelry, cash, and valuables on the premises, is taking money from a burglary ring would you trust her in your house? I doubt it. We all want to keep our families safe. We only let trusted, vetted people into our homes, only hire the best of the best to watch over our children. Well, America is also our home and when we elect a President, we're giving him or her the keys. There's two distinct choices on the ballot in 2016. One, Hillary Clinton, is a serial liar who's proven to be grossly negligent and who has a record of selling access to the highest bidder. A woman who endangered our country, our military, and assets around the world as a matter of convenience. The other candidate, Donald Trump, is an outsider, a prosperous businessman who has created tens of thousands of jobs and built an empire, a man known for keeping his word. Who will you invite in?