It Was Inevitable, Anyone Questioning The Trump Shooting Is Sexist

Today’s leftists don’t even try to hide their hypocrisy. If a conservative was guilty of something, they would unleash the hounds of hell upon them. In that case, they would demand transparency. However, questioning an assassination attempt on Trump is uncivil and instigates rebellion.

So, let’s be clear: I do not believe that what occurred on J13 was an oversight, nor do I think what happened was typical incompetence. I believe that what took place on that Saturday was “Intentional Incompetence.”

The Secret Service’s “omission” of proper procedure was undoubtedly deliberate. Does anyone really believe that the Secret Service left a roof only 150 yards from the stage unprotected by accident? Does anyone buy the excuse given by the Secret Service Director, Kimberly Cheatle, that they thought it was too dangerous because of the slight slope? How about the fact that they knew about Crook’s presence for 50 minutes before Trump took the stage, including the fact that he had a range finder to zero in on the exact distance he would be from his target?

From his elevated vantage point, Crooks was almost as close to the president as the secret service snipers there to protect him. Crooks had a clear and unimpaired line of fire, and he took his shot armed with his father’s AR-15 rifle. It was a chance turn of Trump’s head, not the swift response of those snipers, that made the difference between a grazing glance of the bullet Crooks fired and a fatal shot.

These are not mistakes. These are deliberate omissions. The Secret Service looked the other way and allowed Crooks, the 2024 version of Lee Harvey Oswald, to climb up a preplaced ladder with a preplaced AR-15 rifle, take up a position on the roof, and fire at Trump. This was a preplanned assassination attempt that failed.

Now, they want us to swallow that infamous line: “Mistakes were made.” The worst part is they can’t even mount a defense. They can only say, “It won’t happen going forward.” To illustrate how obvious this is, imagine if an NBA player took the court with both shoes untied. The crowd was screaming and pointing at him, but everyone ignored them. Then, when he tripped and was injured, he tried to pass it off as a simple mistake. The point is this: no basketball player would take the court with both shoes untied unless he was deliberately trying to feign an injury, and no protective agency would allow those things to happen unless they were involved in the attempt.

The question that now must be pursued is who exactly was Thomas Matthew Crooks. There are people who knew he was going to be there, and they rolled out the red carpet for him. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is called exposing the truth. Ask yourself this: is it just a coincidence that on the day when the USSS left the front door wide open for an assassin, one who just happened to show up?

The odds are astronomical that those two circumstances would converge. This was a planned assassination attempt that failed. The Secret Service deliberately looked the other way, period!

Having deliberately dropped the ball on J13 by allowing a sniper to have a clear shot at the Republican nominee, the response to critics is not to address the issues but to lash out and play the victim.

In a letter from Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, they have accused those seeking accountability of being sexists against women in policing.

The DEI-embracing government officials are taking exception with pictures and videos of the inept Secret Service agents who were at the Butler Farm Showgrounds when Trump came within millimeters of being killed. The “Three Female Stooges” next to Trump's Vehicle are becoming poster girls for America’s mushrooming competency crisis and the DEI ideology that ranks skin color and gender as hiring qualities over actual merit.

Mayorkas' letter states:

“In the days following the attempted assassination of former President Trump, some people have made public statements questioning the presence of women in law enforcement, including in the United States Secret Service. These assertions are baseless and insulting.”

“Every single day, in communities big and small across our great country, women are serving in federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, and campus law enforcement. They are highly trained and skilled professionals, who risk their lives on the front lines for the safety and security of others. They are brave and selfless patriots who deserve our gratitude and respect.”

“We in the United States Department of Homeland Security, the largest law enforcement organization in the federal government, will, with great pride, focus, and devotion to mission, continue to recruit, retain, and elevate women in our law enforcement ranks. Our department will be the better for it, and our country will be more secure.”

Both Mayorkas and Cheatle need to be fired as quickly as possible. This is pathetic. Once again, these clowns are asking us to ignore what we have seen with our own eyes. America is not sexist. No one is saying not to hire “Qualified” women. What we are saying is that Cheatle is insisting that by 2030, 30 percent of the Secret Service will be female. That is nothing more than illegal “quota filling” and intrinsically indicates that more qualified people will be overlooked to meet that quota.

My fellow Americans (I’ve always wanted to say/write that), we are not sexist, stupid, or blind. The fact that Cheatle and Mayorkas are still employed is a travesty. The fact that they were an intricate part of what occurred on J13 can’t be denied. They can make excuses, and they will, but that doesn’t change the truth.

Voltaire said: “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”

The radical left is counting on it.