WhatFinger

One year in Atlanta, GA, in excess of $46 million in ITIN refunds were sent to a single address by the IRS for 24,000 illegal aliens who reportedly listed that same address on their tax returns

ITIN: The Massive Tax Loophole Allowing Illegal Aliens to Defraud American Citizens


By & ExHuntress—— Bio and Archives--February 28, 2017

American Politics, News, Opinion | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

In 1996, the IRS began issuing a new type of tax identification number, the Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN). ITINs are assigned to U.S. taxpayers, predominately illegal aliens and their dependents, who are not eligible to obtain a Social Security number.  The primary purpose of ITIN’s was to capture the previously untapped source of new federal tax revenue from undocumented workers.

  • According to the National Immigration Law Center, the most recent information (August 2012) indicated that there had been 21 million ITINs assigned to taxpayers and their dependents by the IRS. 
  • ITINs assigned to illegal alien dependents from Mexico do NOT have to prove that they have ever set foot in the U.S., let alone that they are in the U.S. at the time of application. 
  • Over 9 years and up to 2010, the IRS paid over $14.2 billion of American tax dollars in refunds to illegal aliens, for alleged dependents from whom no identification or residency documents were obtained, and from whom they received $0 in tax revenue.

ITIN is Shovel-Ready Fraud

According to the IRS, ITINs are allegedly issued solely as a means for illegal aliens to pay federal taxes, but in reality they are used by more illegal aliens who actually pay no taxes and who file federal tax returns only to claim tax refunds mainly through the Child Tax Credit (CTC), Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC), and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), on a retroactive basis (up to 3 years).  The Child Tax Credit may allow the filer to reduce their federal income tax by up to $1,000 for each qualifying child.  Under ITIN, illegal aliens can claim up to TWENTY children.

According to the IRS, a qualifying child is a son, daughter, stepchild, foster child, brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister, half-brother, half-sister, or descendant of any of them; for example, a grandchild, niece, or nephew, who was under age 17 at the end of the tax filing year, and who did not provide over half of his or her own support for that year.  The child must have lived with the filer more than half of the year with exceptions available, is claimed as a dependent on the filer‚Äôs return, does not file a joint return for the year, and is a U.S. citizen, a U.S. national, or a U.S. resident alien.

Yet, while a child is supposed to be a U.S. resident to qualify as a dependent for ACTC, they do not have to prove residency if they are from Mexico or Canada.

It should be noted that the ACTC is an available tax credit in addition to the credit for child and dependent care expenses, as well as the earned income credit.  In addition, illegal parents can use ITINs to file refund claims for U.S. born, as well as undocumented dependents.  For taxpayers who may not be able to take full advantage of it because the credit is more than the amount of taxes they owe, the Additional Child Tax Credit is the refundable amount of credit that is available above the amount needed to offset their taxes.  This means that families can receive refunds even if they do not owe any tax.

Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), commonly referred to as the “Stimulus,” signed into law by Barack Obama in February 2009, the minimum earned income amount used to figure the ACTC was reduced to $3,000, from its scheduled amount of $12,500.

Lowering the minimum earned income amount made it possible for more families to claim refunds and also significantly increased the amount of refunds received.  This one step effectively created the vehicle for the subversive funneling of billions of American taxpayer dollars to millions of illegal immigrants without their having to pay any income taxes, or the need for messy and unpopular Congressional debates over additional benefits for illegals.

Si Se Puede Break Federal Law

Section 8 USC 1324 (a) (1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) states, “Any person who…encourages or induces an alien to…reside…knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such…residence is…in violation of law, shall be punished as provided…for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs…fined under title 18…imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”  Further noted in section 274 felonies under the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A:

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when he or she:

  • Assist an alien he/she should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him/her to obtain employment, or
  • Encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him/her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
  • Knowingly assist illegal aliens due to person convictions.

Illegal immigration advocates aggressively push the use of ITINs for identification purposes as an alternative to Social Security numbers. According to the National Immigration Law Center, ITINs may also be used and accepted for such reasons as opening interest-bearing bank accounts, to reduce the tax withholding rate for employment-related settlement payments (such as workers’ compensation claims/lawsuits), for obtaining a mortgage, to claim insurance-premium tax credits for family members eligible for health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act, and to establish eligibility for an exemption from the mandate requiring health insurance since illegal aliens are excluded from all Affordable Care Act benefits.

In clear violation of Section 8 USC 1324 and the INA, twelve states and the District of Columbia allow illegal aliens to obtain drivers licenses, some of which specifically refer to the ITIN as one of the documents accepted to prove identity and residency.

What makes this even more pathetic than blatant disregard for existing federal law is that according to the IRS’ official ITIN application (Form W-7) instructions, dependent applicants must prove identity and U.S. residency UNLESS the applicant is from Mexico or Canada.  Therefore, ITINs assigned to illegal alien dependents from Mexico do NOT have to prove that they have ever set foot in the U.S., let alone that they are in the U.S. at the time of application.

There are clear immigration laws in effect today, yet many in the country, some of whom are federal, state, and local officials, choose to ignore them…and without apparent consequence.

To what extent might the issuance of ITINs be a problem for the safety and sovereignty of the U.S., and at what cost to American taxpayers?

Continued below...

Si Se Puede Bankrupt the United States

According to the National Immigration Law Center, the most recent information (August 2012) indicated that there had been 21 million ITINs assigned to taxpayers and their dependents by the IRS.  Therefore, assuming the number of ITINs has not decreased since 2012, it’s reasonable to believe that there have been at least 21 - 25 million ITINs assigned by the IRS, since 1996.  And although the IRS states that it does not track legal status, it does state that it suspects approximately 55 to 60 percent of ITIN recipients would be illegal aliens.

While there is no doubt that taxes are initially collected from the paychecks of illegal aliens, that does not guarantee that those same illegals actually paid any taxes, but, yet they still received substantial monies from their returns in the form of various refundable credits.

According to audit reports from The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), dated March 31, 2009, and July 07, 2011, the Inspector General examined nine tax years (2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010) to determine the amount of ACTC refunds the IRS paid to people using ITINs, who were technically “not authorized to work” in the United States.

Over those nine years, TIGTA identified $14.228 billion (just through 2010) in ACTC refunds to illegals.  Remember, by definition, ACTC refunds are paid to people who had zero tax liability.  In other words, for those nine years alone, the IRS paid over $14.2 billion of American tax dollars in refunds to illegal aliens, for alleged dependents from whom no identification or residency documents were obtained, and from whom they received $0 in tax revenue.

To make matters worse, several investigations, including an extensive investigative report conducted by 13WTHR Indianapolis, highlighted numerous concerns brought to light initially by IRS whistleblowers, and subsequently substantiated by TIGTA, which identified an even more troubling pattern of incompetence, at best, on the part of IRS workers and managers.  For example:

  • One year in Atlanta, GA, in excess of $46 million in refunds were sent to a single address by the IRS for 24,000 illegal aliens who reportedly listed that same address on their tax returns.
  • Near Detroit, 604 ITIN numbers and 640 tax refunds were issued by the IRS to a single address that had previously been rejected based on questions of its legitimacy.  Regardless, the IRS ultimately issued over $1.5 million in tax refunds to that same address.
  • One year in Indianapolis, the IRS issued 8,714 ITINs to undocumented workers, all of whom claimed to have the same address.
  • One illegal alien admitted that he lived in his single-wide mobile home with his small daughter; however his address was used by four of his illegal friends.  That year, over $29,000 in ACTC refunds were sent to that mobile home by the IRS.

For over a decade, TIGTA has been conducting audits and making recommendations to the IRS and Congress regarding high levels of fraud within the ITIN program.  To date, there has been very little (zero) progress made to curb the fraud and abuse in the ITIN program, despite several damning audit reports by TIGTA.  In fact, the IRS, with the help of Obama, has doubled down on the efforts to allow more undocumented aliens to keep and even extend their tax credit eligibility status.  Before leaving office, the former president offered illegal aliens yet more tax credit payments via the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which is currently unavailable to those who cannot obtain a SSN.  Under his executive action, up to 5 million illegal aliens temporarily avoided deportation by “deferred action.”  At the same time, the Chief Counsel’s officer of the IRS ruled that although EITC is not available to ITIN filers, when a person subsequently obtains a SSN, he/she can file amended tax returns to claim the EITC for the three preceding years they only had an ITIN.  This is estimated to offer bonuses in excess of $24,000 to those who receive deferred action.  In essence, the IRS and Obama further subsidized illegal entry to the U.S. with the promise of four years’ worth of new tax credits.

Even more outrageous? The IRS refuses to share information with other federal agencies, including the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), in direct violation of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1969, as well as The USA Patriot Act of 2001.  So while american seniors didn’t get a cost of living increase through Social Security this year, windfalls of our tax dollars are being paid to illegal aliens and their twenty “children.”


CFPSubcribe

Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Megan Barth & ExHuntress -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Articles with Katy Grimes

Megan Barth is the founder and proprietor of Reaganbabe.com, Co-Chair of the Media Equality Project, and a nationally recognized political commentator.  She is a weekly cohost for WAR-The Wayne Allyn Root Show out of Las Vegas, NV and has appeared on Headline News CNN, NewsMax TV, One America News Network, The Blaze Radio, Lars Larson, Bill Cunningham, and has regular weekly appearances on nationally syndicated radio shows. Her op-eds have been published in Canada Free Press, The Hill, American Thinker and the Daily Caller.  For interviews or speaking engagements, please contact .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: