Juanita Broaddrick absolutely destroys Chelsea Clinton's limp defense of Bill and Hillary Clinton

During the first debate, Donald Trump famously chose "not to go there" when it came to Bill Clinton's long, storied, history of sexual misconduct. Whether he was truly being a gentleman, or simply bringing-it- up-by-telling-you-he's-not-bringing-it-up, the impact has been the same. Almost every media outlet has discussed both the facts and allegations from Bill's past - as well as Hillary's pattern of enabling her husband and targeting his accusers. Yesterday, the "journalists" at Cosmopolitan magazine took a break from writing "10 things that will really turn him on" articles to interview Chelsea Clinton. In their piece, they asked Chelsea about Trump's non-attack. She offered the following, limp, defense of her father's misdeeds and her mother's habit of trying to shame his victims:

---

Well, my reaction to that is just what my reaction has been kind of every time Trump has gone after my mom or my family, which is that it’s a distraction from his inability to talk about what’s actually at stake in this election and to offer concrete, comprehensive proposals about the economy, or our public school system, or debt-free college, or keeping our country safe and Americans safe here at home and around the world. And candidly, I don’t remember a time in my life when my parents and my family weren’t being attacked, and so it just sort of seems to be in that tradition, unfortunately. And what I find most troubling by far are Trump’s — and we talked about this when you interviewed me the night before the Iowa caucus — are Trump’s continued, relentless attacks on whole swaths of our country and even our global community: women, Muslims, Americans with disabilities, a Gold Star family. I mean, that, to me, is far more troubling than whatever his most recent screed against my mom or my family [is].

That didn't sit well with Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick. She took to Twitter and issued an absolutely scathing response via a series of six tweets:

---

---

And that's how you do that. This is representative of Hillary Clinton's overall problem as a candidate, and also an example of why I gave Trump some grief over his first debate performance. There is literally no anti-Trump attack that can't be turned and used against Hillary Clinton. If she says he's too close to Russia, he should bring up the Clinton Foundation's involvement in a deal to sell Russia 20% of US uranium production.

• If she says he has no foreign policy experience, he should bring up her experience with Benghazi.
• If she says you can't trust him, he should bring up her trustworthy numbers and start rattling off her decades of lies.
• If she says he's corrupt, he should lay into the obvious cover-up and protection scheme on the email sandal.
• If she says he in it for the money, he should bring up her pay for play scandal.
• If she says he's an Islamophobia misogynist, he should bring up the fact that Bill and Hillary took $25 Million from Saudi Arabia.
• If she says he's a bully, he should bring up Juanita Broaddrick.

If he can do all of the above quietly and tastefully (yes...I know) while mixing in the pro-American positivity that go him this far, he'll be able to keep her back on her heels. She has no comebacks because, other than one of lies and corruption, she has no record to stand on.

---