WhatFinger

START treaty, Russia, Iran, ICBMs

Keep your eye on the ball—How Biden could Affect Iran’s Nuclear Power Plant


By Christopher Massie Christopher Massie——--August 17, 2010

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


During campaign 2008, then-Senator Joe Biden -- a man who had the potential to be the first Catholic Democrat to hold the position of President since Jack Kennedy -- failed miserably in his quest for the ultimate political post in the nation. Just under one year after announcing his bid for the presidency, Biden suffered a thumping in Iowa, garnering less than 1% of the vote; his defeat was sealed. Dropping out of the race, Biden vowed to continue his work in the Senate, promising to never again seek the presidency.

Seven months later, Barack Obama announced Joe Biden as his running mate. Almost from day one, the relationship was strained. In the now famous New York Times best-seller, "Game Change" by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, Joe Biden is quoted as saying (when aids make him aware of Obama's campaign platform):
"...this is what we're running on?"... "Well, it's your campaign. I'll say what you want me to say. But after Election Day, all bets are off."
And those would not be the only foretelling signs of the relation between Number 1 and Number 2 to be. Also from "Game Change":
"But when Biden, at an October fundraiser in Seattle, famously predicted that Obama would be tested with an international crisis, the then-Illinois senator had had enough. "How many times is Biden gonna say something stupid?" he demanded of his advisers on a conference call, a moment at which most people on the call said the candidate was as angry as they had ever heard him. For his part, the authors write, Biden wasn't pleased with the campaign's direction. Following his campaign plane braggadocio about being more qualified than the man who put him on the ticket, Biden's access to the press was limited and he grilled new staffers that were assigned to him to try and determine if they were part of his team or loyal to Chicago. When the ticketmates talked a few days after Biden's prediction that Obama would be tested, Obama lit into his running mate. But Biden didn't apologize -- or even indicate he understood why his comments in Seattle were problematic, though McCain's campaign had already cut an ad featuring the dark warning. Speaking to his own staff, Biden insisted that it hadn't really been a gaffe. And feeling a bit defensive, he invoked one of the worst memories of Obama's primary campaign. "I guess it's a good thing I didn't say anything about bitter people who cling to their guns and religion," Biden cracked, the authors paraphrase".
Biden recognized his political career was over. He wept as he announced the end of his journey towards the presidency. He conceded defeat as he accepted his position in the Senate to be his final curtain call. Watching this man on television in January 2008 was depressing; there was no doubt Biden was a defeated man. And Obama's selection of Biden as a running mate was condescending; #44-to-be picked Biden knowing full well -- or so he thought -- that Joe would sit quietly in his office, content to nail the plaque of VEEP on the wall before riding off into the sunset. That simply didn't sit well with Biden. Before Obama made this come-from-nowhere leap to the fore, lest we forget, Biden had once endorsed Hillary for president. And we certainly know Biden considered HIMSELF better qualified than Obama. The arrogance witnessed by Biden on the part of Obama was immediately irritating to Joe. And if we listen to recent comments, statements and perceived gaffes by Number 2 -- remembering to keep our eye on the ball -- it becomes increasingly evident that Biden continues to (at the very least) dislike the man in charge. The situation concerning Iran's continued push towards becoming a nuclear state became even more dire last week. News sources in the United States and Israel reported on Friday, August 13, 2010 that Russia will complete the loading of nuclear fuel rods into Iran's Bushehr reactor. This report stunned the international community, especially considering the Obama administration's touted successes with securing an agreement with Russia in the signing of the much-hyped "new START treaty". That "Treaty" was to be a major arms control achievement, to hear the words of Obama, so why then is Russia being allowed to so blatantly move ahead with the buildup in Iran? Keeping our eye on the ball reveals the "Treaty" signing date between the United States and Russia to be April 8, 2010. Obama and the Democrats, particularly Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, however, continue to wrestle with the ratification process in the Senate for this "Treaty". Meanwhile Obama, in a move few may have heard about, may have actually nullified the "Treaty" right before our eyes -- while the Nation, and the Senate, was watching a different ball (but where's JOE?). While the "Treaty" does establish proposals to reduce U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, as well as reduce ballistic missiles and the submarines employed in delivery of such weapons, the "new START treaty" -- according to information obtained from The Heritage Foundation -- is severely lacking in its attention to addressing issues relating to intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBMs). The Heritage Foundation's findings indicate that the "Treaty" actually "facilitates the Russian trend to return to ICBMs", while America moves in the opposite direction. Heritage's report, justifiably, classifies this as a "major concession" by Obama. Question: if the Treaty calls for Russia to pull back on its involvement with the buildup of nuclear weapons, why is Russia now arming a nuclear reactor in a country -- Iran -- known for ties to radical Islam, state-sanctioned terrorism, Sharia-law, Taqiyya, and a an impending war on Israel?! Remember those ICBMs America agreed to move away from: that section of the "Treaty" that so many consider a "concession" by Obama? Remember Taqiyya? On April 23, 2010, a report was quietly released that Obama had decided to open a page from the Rumsfeld-era Pentagon; Obama and his administration had restarted the Rumsfeld-era intercontinental ballistic missile program. This report, obtained from NYTimes.com, attempts to paint a picture depicting an Obama administration seeking means to attack terrorists. The article informs its readers that these American ICBMs, approved by Obama and seemingly an approved part of the "Treaty", would fly "straight up the middle of the Persian Gulf", and be directed from there. Interesting: how far is Israel from the mouth of the Persian Gulf? One more interesting note from that article reveals that Russia, in contrast with Obama and his administration's claims, fiercely oppose the use of these new ICBMs. The Russians, unlike so many Americans, immediately recognized Obama's Taqiyya; these ICBMs would be nuke-ready, aimed at Israel, and would be in complete violation of the "new START treaty" that Obama entered into less than 3 weeks prior to the announcement of his new proposed ICBM strategy. Returning to Biden now, ol' Joe decided a trip to Ukraine and Georgia was in order back in July of 2009. On returning from that trip, he called for the Russian government to play ball with the Obama administration, eliciting responses from some that he was too forceful in his language, while others praised his language as being honest and to the point. What Joe was doing, in fact, was simply channeling the arrogance of Obama; Biden's rhetoric on Georgia -- or any other province -- results in nothing more than mere nods from Medvedev's spokeswoman. Why then would he backdoor such a destructive statement as 'Hey, you need us, man; belly up to the bar and pay your dues'? He was, quite frankly, continuing his consistent undermining of Obama. Joe need not have further isolated Russia, however; Obama sealed that deal himself. And by the time May of 2010 rolled around, Russia would be joined by dozens of our once-close allies as Obama set about to have America ostracized by every major nation in the world. In fact, in an article penned by the London Daily Telegraph, Alex Singleton succinctly portrays Obama thus:
"One of Barack Hussein Obama's first acts as president was to return to Britain a bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office since 9/11. He followed this up by denying Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on his first state visit, the usual joint press conference with flags. For the first time in a long time, the President of the United States is actually distrusted by its allies and not in the least feared by its adversaries. Nor is Mr. Obama now respected by the majority of Americans. Understandably focused on the dismal economy and Mr. Obama's relentless efforts to nationalize and socialize health care, Americans apparently have yet to notice his dismal performance and lack of respect in the world community. They soon will."
If London wants nothing to do with Obama, one can imagine how Russia feels! Evidence of the results of Obama's reckless, arrogant behavior -- behavior Biden is becoming increasingly sick of dealing with -- now shines as a flare in the night sky as we witness the bond formed between Russian and Iran. Obama pressed for sanctions against Iran -- toothless demands that neither Russia NOR China will support -- that were so laughable the entire free world wondered how Ahmadinejad managed such a strong poker hand. And through it all, where's Joe? Keep your eye on the ball. Remember Islam. Remember Taqiyya. Remember what the Qur'an teaches. And remember who we're dealing with in the Oval Office. The Treaty between Russia and America, the "new START treaty", has yet to be ratified. Not only has the United States Senate failed to pass the "Treaty", the Russians are also off the table, having discovered Obama's violation of the agreement through his restarting of the ICBM program. And now we have John Kerry involved, promising to legislate this issue to a successful conclusion no matter what; even going so far as to bring French Ambassador Pierre Vimont in on the fight (I guarantee the French want NOTHING to do with this!) And what palaver are the Democrats pondering as they look to November? Joe Biden was interviewed -- how DOES he continue to sneak out the back door? -- back in mid-July and dropped quite a verbal bomb on the interviewer. No, not another "F"-bomb; but a nice morsel of political-speak to be certain -- IF you're listening. When asked what he thought of the months leading up to this November -- in complete contrast to every other major and minor political pollster, thinker, television personality, or politician worth their salt in the nation -- Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States, replied,
"I think we're going to shock the heck out of everybody."
By now, a majority of America knows -- or at the very least suspects -- that Barack Hussein Obama either IS Muslim, or is strongly sympathetic to the cause. In fact, most Americans who feel strongly that Obama IS Muslim had confirmed through personal research (such as this video compilation) their suspicions by as early as June 2009. Certainly the Arab world, Palestinians, Iran, Israel, and Catholics are equally aware of Obama's Muslim heritage. Obama has not made secret his disdain for Israel, either. In fact, in the history of the office, no other president has treated Israel with such open contempt. Obama's answer to our ally -- after Turkey launched its mercenary-infested flotilla against Israel -- was to meet with Abbas and pledge $millions to Hamas. That came on the heels of the most insulting rejection of the Israeli leader ever leveled by an American diplomat. Netanyahu had earlier visited the White House for a diplomatic meeting and dinner with Obama; only to be literally abandoned in the White House dining room for "daring to disagree" with Barack. And these occurrences are not isolated. Number 44 continues to slight Israel, demeaning Netanyahu and siding with Palestinians and our ally's enemies in the region on issue after issue. And now, come August 21, 2010, Iran -- in allegiance with Russia -- may reach the point of no return... Have we kept our eye on the ball? Do we know where we're all headed? What has Obama kept us focused on? And where is Joe?
"On Friday the 13th of August, the 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, celebrating Ramadan, forcefully endorsed the building of a mosque adjacent to Ground Zero."
The pieces should be coming together for you by now. Russia is aligned with Iraq towards a goal of nuclear capabilities for the latter. Russia has finally been paid the $1 Billion dollars Iraq owed the former USSR when the two countries embarked on their mutual mission, and all proof of Iraq's violations of international nuclear nonproliferation agreements have been successfully removed from the scene. The Qur'an demands that Iraq deceive Russia -- through the use of Taqiyya -- so as to install Islam throughout the world (hence the stalling of payments until all cover ups could be completed). Obama's "efforts to restart relations with Russia" have ended through Obama's use of Taqiyya; a "Treaty" was signed followed by subsequent "leaks" -- leading to Russian "discoveries" -- that violations by the U.S. had occurred. Islam is being united in the Old and New World through a silent pact between Ahmadinejad and Obama -- and lest anyone believe the two are foes: you do not understand Taqiyya; return to square one. Joe Biden: "I think we're going to shock the heck out of everybody." Well, the only way the Democrats could shock most Americans at this point is if they aligned with the Republicans somehow. And while we have heard reports of a few Dems crossing the aisle, the mass exodus certainly doesn't appear to have begun. Or is JOE playing a bit of Taqiyya? The Democrats are embattled with the Republicans on the issue of the "Treaty" -- the battle is a matter of finances. What's so original about that? Republicans have been moaning about Democrats and their hyper-spending for 18 months now. The out of control debt and continued liberal spending, spirally into a sea of red that will render our nation $trillions upon trillions in the tank is the primary campaign platform for the Right this season. But wait! This time, the tables are being flipped. It's the Republicans who are calling for more spending. The Republicans have analyzed the costs involved with a successful implementation of the new "Treaty" and calculated that its effectiveness requires $millions more in upfront capital. Because the Democrats won't go for the cash, the Republicans are stalling in the Senate. The Democrats, spurred on by a Taqiyya-inspired Obama, are likely to begin a campaign -- once Russia finalizes the loading of nuclear fuel rods into Iran's reactor next week -- linking the Republican's stalling on the "Treaty" to the deadly marriage between Russia and Iran. The Dems will downplay the Republican's call for needed capital to successfully fund certain measures of the "Treaty", and Biden's "Shock" will be heard ‘round the world. Democrats will begin to see a momentum shift heretofore unseen by the media at large and November's results will be just as Biden eerily predicted in July. OR, the Roman Catholic who despises Obama will find a bible, then a microphone and save the world from WWIII. Biden will remember his God, his Country, and his sworn duty to protect and honor the Constitution. He will step in front of us, "We The People", and remind every one of us that the Democrats have spent the past 18 months spending our country into oblivion. He will remind everyone that the Democrats, led by Obama, have enacted one ruinous spending measure after another and that Obama-care IS a big "F-ing deal", as he said (but in the most destructive way possible). He'll ask us to ask ourselves why in the world we would ever side with a political party that is now trying to blame the Republicans for wanting to spend money on National Defense; when it has been the Democrats who've been spending on entitlements so as to avert the nation's attention off the real issues going on in the Middle East. Biden will cry out for us to use logic and reasoning; to see the Taqiyya before us; to recognize all that has happened since the false "Treaty" was waved before us, right up to now -- to the 13th of August when Obama stealthily (based on the teachings in the Qur'an) jockeyed back and forth and back again on the Ground Zero mosque. "People", Biden will proclaim, "you have concluded the man to be Muslim, why would he stand before you and throw himself on the sword; why would Obama so forcefully endorse the mosque, then keep this issue in the media by retracting, then retracting the retraction -- even silently calling for Canadian Muslims to appear on television in defense of the Conservatives?! All the while keeping your eye off the ball as Russia, angered by Obama, now in cahoots with Iran, sets to fulfill prophecy by aiming Jihad straight at Israel." Biden could TRULY "shock the heck out of everybody" by calling the nation together to cease the beginning of Armageddon before the launch is irreversible. In short, our Catholic Vice President could finally have his Jack Kennedy moment! Or he could just end it all by rendering himself Satan's puppet... It's your choice Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. -- your God is watching... Armageddon Power Plant

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Christopher Massie——

Christopher Massie, BS, CS, Founder & Patriot of Drain The Swamp 2010,
Critical Reading for the Conservative American


Sponsored