WhatFinger

They Were First to File Court Challenge and Participated in Supreme Court Victory

Klayman and Arpaio cheer Supreme Court affirmance in Texas amnesty case



Washington, D.C., Today, Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch and a former federal prosecutor saluted the so-called conservatives on the Supreme Court for holding fast in effectively affirming the decisions by a Texas federal court and the Fifth Circuit blocking President Barack Hussein Obama's executive amnesty for over 5 million illegal aliens, including likely Muslim terrorists.
Klayman and Arpaio were the first to challenge this unconstitutional executive amnesty but drew an Obama-appointed judge who dismissed the case claiming it was only a political ploy. Later an Obama-packed federal appeals court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, affirmed the lower court's decision, uttering hardly a word about the merits of the case. However, a fine judge, the Honorable Andrew S. Hanen, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas took the correct and legally honest legal path and blocked Obama's amnesty. The Obama Justice Department, led by Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the president's pliant law enforcement officer, took an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and, in a "slam dunk," quickly lost again. Today's split Supreme Court ruling along partisan lines not only underscores just how political the High Court has become, but cements Judge Hanen's ruling. In any event, the amicus brief filed by Klayman and Arpaio before the Supreme Court contributed to the victory today, as did their initial complaint before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which was virtually copied by Texas and the myriad of other states that later mounted the court challenge before Judge Hanen. Klayman had this to say for himself and his client, America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio: "Having started the ball rolling on this challenge to President Obama's illegal and unconstitutional executive actions granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens including likely Muslim terrorists who have crossed our borders and are here on bogus student visas and other subterfuges, we are thankful that the so-called conservatives on the Supreme Court held fast to the leftists on the High Court. While we have little hope that President Obama will now take action to deport these illegal aliens, particularly since they are a large illegal voting block for the Democrats this fall, this Supreme Court ruling at least tells Obama and his allies that their lawlessness will not be countenanced. Unlike a judge in Arizona who has been presiding over a compromised and ethically conflicted trial of Sheriff Arpaio that also concerns illegal immigrants in Maricopa County, four justices of the Supreme Court did the right thing and shut the door to Obama's lack of respect for the will of We the People. They legally stood up to an out-of-control president who rules like he is King George III in 1776. As bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers in the Constitution, this is the proper role of the judiciary, to serve as a check and balance to government tyranny." For more information or for an interview email daj142182@gmail.com.


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Larry Klayman——

Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is known for his strong public interest advocacy in furtherance of ethics in government and individual freedoms and liberties. During his tenure at Judicial Watch, he obtained a court ruling that Bill Clinton committed a crime, the first lawyer ever to have done so against an American president.


Sponsored