Lowest Birthrates, Highest Immigration Define Trudeau's Disastrous Legacy

"The decrease in the TFR [total fertility rate] from 2021 to 2022 (-7.4%) is the largest decrease since 1971 to 1972 (-7.6%), at the height of the “baby bust” that followed the baby boom (1946 to 1965). Canada’s decrease was one of the largest among high-income countries."

In 2022, the Liberal government of Canada set a new immigration record with 471,550 new permanent residents admitted to our country. All of which brings about questions conveniently eschewed by Canadian media.

Why did a succession of federal governments disregard the relevancy of birth-rates in our country? To what extent, if any, could this be considered intentional? Is it possible that the situation is emblematic of government's agenda to re-imagine Canada as a "post-modern, no core identity" society as originally conceived by PM Justin Trudeau?

Paranoia can run deep, but under iron-clad "woke control of the Liberals, smart money says not to count these concepts out. We turn to Europe, where declines in domestic birth-rates have also run rampant.

"For Emmanuel Macron, more babies are vital to maintain France's national vigour. Italy's Georgia Meloni has made encouraging more Italian women to give birth top priority."

"In the far north, Finnish parents are being paid to have babies. The municipality of Miehikkälä has increased that[payments] to $10,970 per child. Other European countries are pursuing similar policies as they try to reverse the continent’s falling birthrate."

Something nefarious exists at the heart of the birth-rate/immigration/housing dynamic?

Then there is Canada:

"Many countries saw a substantial decrease in fertility from 2021 to 2022, but Canada’s was among the largest. Among G7 members and other selected high-income countries with comparable data, Canada and South Korea tied for the largest absolute decrease in TFR from 2019 to 2022."

What to make of this ominous social condition? When media refuse to pipe-in, they are relieved of responsibility for shedding light on additional factors involved. Without question, the Covid pandemic has contributed in a profound manner:

"There are many ways in which the Covid-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted fertility. The number of births in January 2021 was 8.3% lower than in January 2020; in contrast, the average year-over-year decrease in the number of January births for the period from 2009 to 2019 was 0.1%."

There you have it. As disseminated from China, the pandemic is responsible for a rapid decrease in our domestic fertility rates. As most are aware, Trudeau considers China to be his favourite country, apart from Canada [or likely inclusive of it].

"The Canadian birth rate is continuing to drop to historical lows — a trend that is likely connected to the crushing price of housing for young people looking to start families."

Economists explain that one of the main reasons for lack of home affordability is due to immigration policy, a situation which the Liberals waltzed into with all-eyes-open.

Beginning to get the impression that something nefarious exists at the heart of the birth-rate/immigration/housing dynamic? If so, it's likely you are not alone.

"In 2006, Quebec joined the ranks of the provinces with the highest fertility rates, following the expansion of family-related policies in the province."

Agenda exists for complete renovation of Canadian society?

Quebec-- but not English Canada. What a shock this is. [Not- Ed.].

As distasteful as it is, Cultural Action Party [est. 2016] choose to dig deeper.

Is shouldn't take Sherlock Holmes to recognize that our Liberal government's social policies contain a damaging commonality. What effect do abortion, LGBT, Euthanasia and transgenderism have on Canadian birth-rates? Answer-- they impede domestic births.

Why would Trudeau and his woke Liberal cabal go and do something like this? The answer is likely found in another media omission, discovered in the "type" of Canadians who most indulge.

The stats aren't available, but it appears more than likely that new arrivals from top source nations-- India, China, Iran, Pakistan, Nigeria-- indulge far less than locals. Likely it is that the lion's share of those who partake derive from our multi-generational "Old Stock" communities.

Looking at abortion statistics alone weaves a tale of demographic woe. Not for 95% of Canadians, because media have yet to expose the truth in this regard. The founder of abortion policy [in reality a non-policy] is ex-Liberal PM Pierre Trudeau. The result is a staggering 2.5 million abortions taking place since the 1970's.

That's a lot of potential Canadians, to which the Liberals offer their panacea: the highest per-capita immigration rates on planet earth. Ever get the feeling that behind-our-backs, as obscured by mainstream media, an agenda exists for complete renovation of Canadian society?

And who, pray-tell, exists as the 'fall guy" in all this? It doesn't take Stephen Hawking to deduce a correct response: "Old Stock" Canadians-- Anglophones, Christians, multi-generational citizens of European origin, and the like.

The Greatest Story Never Told? CAP leave readers to draw their own conclusion.