Can these cultures be reconciled? I think not. One of them must yield, but which one?
As one example, I wrote earlier of how people would come together to assist those in need, but how there was also an expectation that those helped would take no more than was needed and would assume a moral obligation to contribute to future assistance for others. Contrast that with a culture where charity is considered a foolish weakness and anyone receiving "free" support is expected to take as much as possible while it is available, and there is no obligation for repayment. What happens when you have a culture that expects to take as much as it can when opportunity presents is placed in a culture that expects those in need to take no more than needed and repay that taken?
There are many other differences between the cultures, some large, and some small, that accumulate in destructive ways, not just in Minnesota, but throughout America. Consider that most people will form lines to wait for service, whether at a DMV office, or at a sports event in order ensure that everyone has a chance to be served. Many of the imported cultures see waiting in line as stupid and weak. The strong will go to the head of the line to make sure that they get their portion while there is still something to get. If there isn't enough for everyone, then it is appropriate that those too weak to fight for a position should lose out. Can these cultures be reconciled? I think not. One of them must yield, but which one?
One major cultural expectation is that of equal justice for all. Most would consider it an injustice to support someone who committed a clearly illegal act, especially when that act caused suffering and harm to innocent parties. In addition to the Somali immigrants, many other non-citizens have been imported into Minnesota and provided with food, medical and housing assistance, and many other services, often at taxpayer expense.
Under current immigration laws, this assistance must be repaid by the sponsors, but in most cases, the sponsoring agency is not only not held accountable, but is often paid to bring in and settle these non-citizens. Typically, these people are classed as "refugees" seeking asylum from persecution in their home countries, thus allowing them to bypass many of the requirements for legal immigration.