Muslim Convert Judge Rules Against American Citizen Attacked by Muslim Immigrant

In Front Porch Politics on February 24, 2012, with added comments from The Blaze published on February 23, 2012, the unfortunate story of an incident that began as a form of protest by atheists marching in the Halloween parade last October, one as "Zombie Muhammad" and another as "Zombie Pope". No harm was inflicted on the latter of the two demonstrators where charges were brought and a trial was conducted on the actions perpetrated by the Muslim who was 'offended' by the depiction of Muhammad. In this case, a judge of Muslim faith "lectured," not the violator of the law but the seriously injured and abused victim on, of all things, the Joys of Islam. Where is the joy; particularly in this case? Due to the judge's ruling the joy is found only in the minds of the violator and his co-religious believing judicial savior, the very wrong judge. Is this what our judicial findings are coming to in America; false associations with religion? The assault was captured on video and the Muslim man admitted to his crime, saying that he did not know mocking Muhammed was actually legal in the U.S.. Charges, of course, were filed. This is one of the reasons why Americans are so insistent that immigrants should not be allowed residency in the United States until they are familiar with basic human rights laws set forth in our Constitution, among other things such as knowledge of the language, etc.

Viciously beating on an American citizen who was expressing his First Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech certainly brought no joy to the victim. I don't mean to approve of anyone bringing mockery to another person's religion, but physically beating that person is well beyond the violation of the victim's First Amendment rights. Overly exaggerated in this case with an ignorant of the law, by choice, immigrant savagely beating a lawful American citizen in stark violation of his rights to free speech and then finding an immigrant judge lecturing the injured and abused victim while the violator goes scot free. How many times have we Americans heard the pronouncements of a judge saying, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse for the violation of that law." I suspect that nearly all immigrants to this country, except those of Islamic faith, are aware that inflicting bodily punishment on another person except in self-defense from physical harm is a violation of our constitutional laws and must be punished when administered to another person. For an immigrant who claims to be a beneficiary of this Islamic joy to violently inflict injury on another legal citizen, or anybody for that matter, the penalty should be immediate deportation from our country. This is a prime example of a violation of the law as is DOCUMENTED in this country and usually enforced by judges who have sworn to uphold our Constitution. Judges who are complicit in the violation of the laws for which they have sworn to uphold should be subject to the same punishment, eviction from the bench and deportation to the country from which they came. I call upon our Congress to take immediate action in the case cited here to disclaim the verdict that was made and begin legislation production to facilitate the removal of that judge (Mark Martin) from his position with the Pennsylvania 20th District Appeals Court. Deportation may not be possible if Martin, a Muslim convert is an American citizen, but removal from the bench for such a flagrant violation of duties and ethics is mandatory. For the rest of this story, go to the Blaze