Nearly two weeks ago Newfoundland and Labrador premier, Danny Williams, stood in the House of Assembly and made an announcement touted by papers across Canada as a turning point for his province.
The mainstream media and the premier have since waxed eloquently about how Newfoundland and Labrador’s new ability to wheel hydro power through Quebec to American markets may herald the dawn of a new day.
The problem is that it actually means nothing of the sort.
Yes, Quebec has refused to allow just such an arrangement in the past but what does it really mean for the future of Newfoundland and Labrador or its ability to reach markets with the proposed Lower Churchill development?
It means absolutely nothing from that perspective which is why I find myself quite puzzled by the premier’s apparent elation over the event.
The timing and tone of premier Williams “ground breaking”, “turning point” announcement earlier this month simply because of Quebec’s sudden acceptance a token amount of power being transmitted on their under utilized grid has my gut telling me to be wary.
In order to wheel the more than 3000 megawatts to be generated by the Lower Churchill across Quebec a great deal of new capacity would have to be added to the grid and, just as in the past, every Newfoundlander and Labradorian knows, or should know, that Quebec has no plans to allow anyone other than themselves to build new transmission infrastructure inside their “nation” unless they own, control and reap the profits from it.
Over capacity is one thing. New capacity is something else all together.
Newfoundland and Labrador can kick and scream all it wants. Danny Williams can blow a gasket, grow a new one and blow that. The Canadian constitution can be quoted chapter and verse on this issue (which supports Newfoundland and Labrador’s ability to access markets) and it can be proclaimed from the highest mountains but in the end Ottawa, as it always does, will acquiesce to the demands and desires of vote rich Quebec. Newfoundland and Labrador be damned.
None of that does, or should, come as a surprise to anyone living in Newfoundland and Labrador for more than five minutes. What has come as a bit of a shock is Danny Williams apparent need to “spin” the province’s ability to export a paltry 200 megawatts of power, with Quebec’s blessing, as some sort of major breakthrough.
It’s more than a little odd to this observer that the Premier would be touting this as a victory and claiming it bodes well for future developments when that clearly isn’t the case.
Has political expediency and the need to “play well at home” trumped reality for yet another of Newfoundland and Labrador’s premiers?
Has premier Williams been listening to his own publicity team for so long now that he’s actually started to believe them?
Don’t get me wrong, on the whole I like what the premier has done over the past couple of terms and I’ve been happy to back him on the issues he’s been strong enough to take a stand on, but this one has me baffled.
Why would the premier of Newfoundland and Labrador consider it a shining moment for his province simply because Quebec made a token gesture at a time when they plan to develop a multi-billion dollar hydro project just outside the Labrador border?
Ever since that border was defined in 1927 Quebec has disputed its exact location.
Did Quebec really turn a page with this recent announcement or is premier Charest hoping premier Williams won’t make too much fuss about the fact that one of the grey areas in the 1927 border decision just happens to contain the headwaters that will feed Quebec’s massive Romaine hydro project?
As has often been said, “He who controls the headwaters controls the project.”
Recently I requested specific clarification from the government of Newfoundland and Labrador concerning the border and its relationship to the headwaters of the Romaine River. To an untrained eye, which I am not ashamed to say I have, it’s debatable as to which province can stake claim to those waters.
To date there has been no response but I continue to wait (im)patiently.
When it comes to the “big” announcement a couple of weeks ago I’m not accusing anyone of anything underhanded but I certainly have questions.
In 2005 professors Feehan and Baker released a research paper on the Upper Churchill renewal clause. That paper contained previously unknown evidence pointing to the use of coercion and inside information as the means by which Newfoundland and Labrador was forced into signing the disastrous Upper Churchill contract. It concluded that a legal challenge could be made.
Since that time the Williams’ government has never openly discussed those findings or pursued a legal challenge to the contract. Instead, the provincial government later released the province’s long term energy plan. A document that makes no mention of attempts to rectify the Upper Churchill debacle and containins a plan that extends until 2041, the same year the one sided contract will have run its entire course (without challenge).
In 2008 the Williams government quietly sent a letter to the joint Quebec/Federal panel reviewing the environmental impacts of the Romaine hydro project. The letter expressed concern about the misrepresentation of the Southern Labrador border on maps being used for the process. It made no mention of any concern with Quebec pushing ahead on a project that might depend on headwaters inside Labrador.
The letter was sent to the review panel without any fanfare, publicity or notification of the media. It was only through a chance discovery but one local reporter that the letter ever became public knowledge in the first place.
Why was so little concern expressed about the project and the headwaters and and why was the letter sent so quietly?
In recent months premier Williams has publicly stated on several occasions that he has no concern with Quebec’s Romaine River hydro development. How can this be the case given our history?
After being fleeced for decades on the Upper Churchill, if the Romaine’s headwaters are indeed inside Newfoundland and Labrador territory doesn’t that mean that Newfoundland and Labrador should have a stake in the project?
Does the lack of concern mean the provincial government simply plans to let Quebec push forward with no financial benefit accruing to Newfoundland and Labrador from what amounts to yet another of its extremely valuable natural resources?
If so, why would anyone do that?
Could it be that the “token gesture” made by Quebec in allowing a small amount of power to be sold through its grid was a down payment to the provincial government on a promise to support the Lower Churchill development once the Romaine has been completed?
If so, is a promise like that worth the paper it could never actually be written on?
These are questions that need to be answered.
There may indeed be very rational and reasonable responses to each of them but they need to be asked and answered.
I don’t mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist but I can’t help it. The celebratory position taken by premier Williams, not to mention the copious level of high praise, encouragement, kudos and smiley faced pats on the back flowing like sweet molasses from the national media over what should have been a mundane non-event, has me wanting those answers sooner rather than later.
