By Robert Laurie ——Bio and Archives--February 19, 2015
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
The Obama administration was given multiple chances Wednesday to endorse a longtime ally’s airstrikes on America’s biggest enemy at the moment, the so-called Islamic State. Over and over again, Obama’s aides declined to back Egypt’s military operation against ISIS. ...“We are neither condemning nor condoning” the Egyptian strikes, is all one U.S. official would tell The Daily Beast.
“The Egyptian military, in particular, is very frustrated with us,” one U.S. government official explained to The Daily Beast. “It is mutual frustration.” At a briefing with reporters Wednesday, Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby called the relationship with Egypt “complicated.” “We are constantly reviewing our relationship with Egypt,” Kirby said.We can't imagine why a nation that's doing what it can to eliminate the most violent U.S. enemies in generations would be frustrated with our President's disinterest in doing the same. The fact of the matter is that we're closing in on a "time of choosing." United States citizens are going to have to decide. Is our President incapable of destroying ISIS, disinterested in destroying ISIS, or unwilling to destroy ISIS? Unfortunately, it has to be one of those three. After all, we have the most powerful military on the face of the Earth. If we chose to do so, we could take the gloves off and neuter ISIS in 30 days. Yet we've spent a year-and-a-half employing obscenely limited strategies that now seek to exploit the situation by using it to promote existing Obama administration goals like health care and wealth redistribution. At some point, we're going to have to ask ourselves: Is Obama a failure, or a sympathizer? Those are quickly becoming the only two options.
View Comments
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.