WhatFinger

Were the terrorist attacks during Obama’s reign “large scale?” Maybe they were small, medium or large. As Hillary said about Benghazi, “What difference does it make?”

OBAMA DENIES LARGE-SCALE ATTACKS


By David Lawrence ——--December 13, 2016

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


Obama says that since he became President, "there have been no large-scale attacks on the United States." Does he consider Major Nidal Malik Hasan killing 13 people at Fort Hood Texas small scale? Does he consider the Boston Marathon that killed three and injured more than 260 small scale?
Does he consider San Bernardino where 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured in a terrorist attack small scale? Does he consider it small scale when Omar Mateen killed fifty people in a gay bar, Pulse, in Orlando? Muslims sympathizers who will not say Radical Islam like Obama should parrot the Quran and consider just one death a large-scale attack. In the Quran it says, “Whoever kills a person [unjustly]…it is as though he has killed all mankind. And whoever saves a life, it is as though he had saved all of mankind.” The Quran seems peaceful. Yet jihadists are some of the most blood thirsty people in the world. So what is Obama doing saying “there have been no large-scale attacks on the United States.? According to Muslims, even one death is a large-scale attack. Muslims believe the murder of one man is the killing of all. Obama has tried to bring us closer to Muslims. Much vilified Bush had zero attacks in over seven years after 9/11. Were the terrorist attacks during Obama’s reign “large scale?” Maybe they were small, medium or large. As Hillary said about Benghazi, “What difference does it make?”

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

David Lawrence——

David Lawrence is a writer for Canada Free Press.


Sponsored