By Dan Calabrese ——Bio and Archives--February 11, 2014
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Under the new Treasury rule, firms with 50 to 99 full-time workers are free from the mandate until 2016. And firms with 100 or more workers now also only need cover 70% of full-time workers in 2015 and 95% in 2016 and after, not the 100% specified in the law. The new rule also relaxes the mandate for certain occupations and industries that were at particular risk for disruption, like volunteer firefighters, teachers, adjunct faculty members and seasonal employees. Oh, and the Treasury also notes that, "As these limited transition rules take effect, we will consider whether it is necessary to further extend any of them beyond 2015." So the law may be suspended indefinitely if the White House feels like it. By now ObamaCare's proliferating delays, exemptions and administrative retrofits are too numerous to count, most of them of dubious legality. The text of the Affordable Care Act specifically says when the mandate must take effect..."after December 31, 2013"...and does not give the White House the authority to change the terms.There are two ways to read this, and my guess is that they're both correct. The policy view is that Obama recognizes how weak job creation is, and just as employers told him last year the mandate would deflate what little strength there was then, things have gotten no better and the same is true today. He knows that as bad as things are right now, they're going to get far worse if he fires that bullet into the torso of the job market, so he simply can't do it. Then there's the political view, and this one is easy. Remember what a political disaster it was for Democrats in the fall when folks on the individual market started getting their cancellation letters? Once the employer mandate kicks in, that whole thing repeats itself - this time with people who get insurance through their employers getting the ziggy. And under the current schedule, that would have commenced in October 2014 - just before the mid-term elections. You think 2010 was a Red Wave election? Just imagine what would have happened if we'd had an election a few weeks after that. It's politically shameless, and it's a totally unconstitutional power grab, but Obama can't afford to care at this point. Chances are he won't let the mandate go into effect next year either, or ever, because the same problems will always present themselves. What we have here is a law that is complicated enough as written, but essentially means nothing anyway because the president has no compunction about simply altering it on the fly - and no one seems to know a way to stop him. He is making it up as he goes along, and until ObamaCare is repealed in full, that is what he will continue to do.
View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.