Banning production on federal lands would curtail jobs and revenue in states that are prospering from energy production
Institute for Energy Research , Bio and Archives--January 20, 2020
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Oil and gas production on public lands has increased significantly since President Trump took office. President Trump has opened up millions of acres of land administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for resource development. Drilling permits have increased almost 40 percent under the Trump administration, according to BLM data. Several states (e.g., New Mexico, Wyoming, and Colorado) have benefited from the increased activity on federal lands. Forty-eight percent of the revenue from lease sales goes to the state where the oil and gas activity is occurring for their roads, schools, and public services; the rest goes to the U.S. Treasury. If the leases result in producing oil or natural gas wells, revenue from royalties are also shared with the state.
Despite the benefits of energy production on federal lands, many of the Democratic Party’s presidential candidates oppose it and the Democrats in the House of Representatives have proposed a bill to temporarily halt leases. Federal lands account for about a quarter of our nation’s oil, natural gas, and coal production. In 2018, oil production on federal lands was 815 million barrels, natural gas production was 4.2 trillion cubic feet, and coal production was 310 million tons.
Source: Department of Interior
Source: Global Energy Institute
Source: Department of Interior
Oil and gas lease sales in New Mexico’s two fossil fuel producing regions—the Four Corners area in the northwest part of the state, and in the Permian Basin in the southeast—quadrupled since President Trump took office. According to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), in 2018, a two-day lease sale in New Mexico brought in more revenue than all BLM oil and gas sales in 2017 combined. Revenue from the sale totaled $972,483,619.50, of which roughly $500 million was returned to New Mexico for its roads, schools, and public services. Federal land represents 34.7 percent of the land in New Mexico.
In fiscal year 2019, New Mexico received the highest disbursement of any state and it was the greatest allocation received in the state’s history at $1.17 billion.
According to the study by the Global Energy Institute, if energy production on federal lands were banned, New Mexico would lose 24,300 jobs (10,000 direct, 14,300 indirect and induced) and $496 million in annual royalty collections (2015), representing eight percent of the state’s total General Fund Revenues. That would be a major blow to state just beginning to proper from the state’s oil and gas boom.
Source: Department of Interior
In fiscal year 2019, Wyoming received the second largest disbursement of any state at $641.11 million.
According to the study by the Global Energy Institute, if energy production on federal lands were banned, Wyoming would lose 32,600 jobs (13,300 direct, 19,300 indirect and induced) and almost $900 million in annual royalty collections (2015), representing about 20 percent of the state’s education-related expenditures.
Source: Department of Interior
In fiscal year 2019, Colorado received the third-highest disbursement of any state at $108.05 million.
According to the study by the Global Energy Institute, if energy production on federal lands were banned, Colorado would lose 50,000 jobs (15,300 direct, 34,700 indirect and induced), and as much as $125 million in annual royalty collections (2015).
View Comments
The Institute for Energy Research (IER) is a not-for-profit organization that conducts intensive research and analysis on the functions, operations, and government regulation of global energy markets. IER maintains that freely-functioning energy markets provide the most efficient and effective solutions to today’s global energy and environmental challenges and, as such, are critical to the well-being of individuals and society.