Andrew McCarthy explains in exhaustive detail.
Dan Calabrese , Bio and Archives--August 8, 2016
American Politics, News | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
National Review's Andrew McCarthy is a former federal prosecutor who does an excellent job of explaining how and why actions by politicians are in violation of federal law. His work is one of the primary reasons we know Hillary Clinton got away with multiple felonies in the use of her schlock, homebrew e-mail server. So it's no surprise that it's McCarthy who digs down and shows us that the Obama Administration didn't just skirt the edges of federal law by making its now-infamous cash drop to Iran.
It clearly and unmistakably committed multiple feloies in doing so. To really gain an understanding of just how bad this is, you need to click over and read the whole thing, but here are the lowlights:To summarize, the anti-terrorism sanctions are still in effect, a fact the administration has touted many times. Obama conceded at his press conference both that these sanctions are still in effect and that they applied directly to his $400 million pay-out to our terrorist enemies. But here’s the president’s problem: While he is correct that the sanctions barred him from sending Iran a check or wire transfer, that is not all they forbid — not by a long shot. They also make it illegal to do what he did. As noted above, the sanctions prohibit transactions with Iran that touch the U.S. financial system, whether they are carried out in dollars or foreign currencies. The claim by administration officials, widely repeated in the press, that Iran had to be paid in euros and francs because dollar-transactions are forbidden is nonsense; Americans are also forbidden to engage in foreign currency transactions with Iran. Obama had our financial system issue U.S. assets that were then converted to foreign currencies for delivery to Iran. Both steps flouted the regulations, which prohibit the clearing of currency of any kind if Iran is even minimally involved in the deal; here, Iran is the beneficiary of the deal. The regs further prohibit supplying things of value to Iran, regardless of whether it is done “directly or indirectly.” Expressly included in the “indirect” category are transfers of assets to another country with knowledge that the other country will then forward the assets, in some form, to Iran. That’s exactly what happened here, with Obama pressing the Swiss and Dutch into service as intermediaries.
View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.