A boycott of your latest opus is a way for the people you've offended to make their speech heard
Robert Laurie , Bio and Archives--November 6, 2015
American Politics, News | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
As you're probably aware, filmmaker Quentin Tarantino attended an October 24 rally against police brutality. There, he declared “I’m a human being with a conscience. And when I see murder I cannot stand by. And I have to call the murdered the murdered and I have to call the murderers the murderers.”
After his comments ignited a firestorm of controversy, Tarantino indicated that he was only speaking about specific cases, saying: “in those cases in particular that we’re talking about, I actually do believe that they were murder. Now, in the case of Walter Scott, who was the man running in the park and was shot in the back, and the case of Sam DuBose, I believe those were murder, and they were deemed murder. And the reason — and the only reason they were deemed murder is because the incidences were caught on video.""Yeah. I was surprised. I was under the impression I was an american and that I had 1st Amendment rights, and there was no problem with me going to an anti-police brutality protest, and speaking my mind. And just because I was at an anti-police brutality protest doesn’t mean I’m anti-police."This, obviously, proves that you don't have to be a genius to make great movies. No, Mr. Tarantino. A boycott doesn't violate your rights. Your free speech is safe and sound, as indicated by your initial comments, your multiple TV interviews, and the film which will be opening on thousands of screens this Christmas.
View Comments
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.