Which wasn't nearly as absurd as some people's comments, which show just how skewed people's view of the police has become
Dan Calabrese , Bio and Archives--August 9, 2016
Lifestyles | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Yesterday around noon, someone in my city robbed a bank. It happened at the TCF Bank branch at 12 Mile and Crooks (yeah, I love that too) here in Royal Oak - which in case you're not a regular reader, is just outside Detroit.
As this was happening, I was sitting a few blocks away in a park, writing. This is not an unusual thing for me to do. I find that an office is an unnecessary expense, but I'm not a big fan of working at home, so in the summer I like to find my way to a picnic table or some other outdoor venue and get my work done. Some people who see me doing it think it's strange, though, and yesterday someone who spotted me also had this thought: Maybe that guy sitting there is the bank robber!
Ridiculous? Not entirely. The bank robber was a white guy, about 5-8, with brown hair and a slender build, in his late 20s or 30s. I'm a white guy, about 5-7. I do have brown hair, although I was wearing a hat. The slender build? Well, if I got mistaken for a guy with a slender build then I'm making progress. And I'm a fair bit older than 20s or 30s, but riding around on my bike the way I'm usually dressed, I've been mistaken for younger."The question I'd like answered is, did you, in any way, fit the description of the bank robber? Let's say, a white guy, in his middle years with thinning hair, openly carrying a laptop, riding a getaway bike, thought to be using a public park as his hideout? If so, then, yes, they most definitely were doing their job. If not, they simply were grasping at straws so that it would look like they were doing something tangentially related to their job."Think of the logic it takes to believe what this guy was suggesting - that less than an hour after a bank robbery, the Royal Oak PD would surveil a guy they knew wasn't involved just so they could look busy to their bosses, rather than trying to catch the real guy. I found it intriguing, and sadly indicative of the times in which we're living, that this handful of Einsteins felt the need not only to critique the police work that was done, but to talk in terms of my being "harassed" (I wasn't) or being glad that I was OK, as if I was somehow in danger of being shot, or would have been had I not been white. Or that the whole thing must have represented bumbling and bungling by the police because they should have somehow known, for sure, beyond a doubt, with the bank robber still on the loose, that it couldn't possibly be me. Without even talking to me they should have just known that. For my own part, I found the officers thorough, professional and respectful. They did not harass me. They explained what they were doing and why. They made it clear what they expected of me, and they assessed the information they were gathering objectively. When it was clear I couldn't be their bank robber, they wished me well and I reciprocated. Contrary to the way some people tried to describe it, I was not "put through" anything. It was no big trauma. I wasn't angry with them for thinking I might be their suspect. I understood that if they wanted to catch the real bank robber, they needed to check off this box. So I helped them check it off. But much of today's cultural attitude says I should have called the local news and an attorney, and that I was harassed, and that my life was in danger, and that my rights were violated. That is all such a complete load of crap, I don't even know where to start in knocking it all down. We do have rights as citizens. We also have responsibilities, and in this case my responsibility was to cooperate and respectfully answer their questions. That was not difficult. It only took a few minutes and I was neither harmed, scared, threatened nor even really inconvenienced beyond a moment. But this has become such a pansy-ass country that people can't even accept a simple duty like this without freaking out and threatening lawsuits. It's no wonder every time we see video of something the police do, people jump to insane conclusions and start in with nonsense about "police brutality," when in almost every situation they are only using force because some total idiot failed to simply follow their instructions. I think I have even more appreciation for the Royal Oak Police Department today than I did before this, because they were so fair and professional in dealing with me. And I'm sure most police departments around the country are very much the same way. Like the clueless commenters above, most of the supposed police misconduct you think you see is a product of your own imaginations and preconceived notions of situations you really don't understand, and that you pre-judge based on your own faulty comprehension of what really goes on out there. By the way, here's a photo of the real bank robber, taken by bank security video. In my opinion, he's not good-looking enough to be me!

View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.