States lead in blocking Fed/UN/WHO edicts, weather modification

National sovereignty is up for grabs as far as international money interests are concerned. They may have a point in that too many politicians are willing to sell-out their country for a pittance when compared to the trillions of dollars (and other currencies) controlled by the One Percent, whose wealth in America has reached $44 Trillion.

In the United States, what the billionaire class may have overlooked is the founding document that stands between them and their attempt to take over the nation via a compromised administration, judiciary and Congress. The Constitution, which powerbrokers believe is easily trod upon, empowers the 50 singular entities – the states – more than the confederation seated in Washington, D.C.

State legislatures are waking up to the fact that the national constitution limits federal power to herd them into compliance, retaining ultimate authority in the hands of the individual states and the people.

While the World Health Organization is ramping up their effort to try to force all (if they can get it) nations to submit to its unethical and illegitimate authority, states like Louisiana are invoking their Ninth and Tenth Amendment rights to reject it.

There appears to be a void of comprehension about the scope of authority that can be wielded over Americans by treaty. Chalk it up to schools no longer teaching proper English grammar but replacing it with language arts. As much as progressives (communists, really) have tried to brand the U.S. Constitution as a “living” document in an effort to make the language malleable to suit what’s currently popular, the document is to be plainly interpreted exactly as written.¹

Accordingly, no other agreement or treaty can supersede the Constitution, and any treaty that attempts to override or undermine the individual rights of American citizens is not enforceable. Not only that, but states’ obligation to protect the rights of their citizens, even at the expense of federal regulations or legislation that would impugn those rights, gives states the ultimate power to nix such infringement.

Recognizing this charge to protect their citizens, Louisiana has passed legislation that denies international entities such as the WHO, United Nations, and World Economic Foundation from attempting to impose authority within, or interfere with, the state.

Other states have begun to deny access to programs that have heretofore run roughshod over state authority.

The Tennessee Senate recently passed a bill banning weather modification and geo-engineering in their state, and has now passed it on to the Tennessee House. Despite legacy media demeaning the effort as empowering conspiracy theories about whether these programs exist, cloud seeding and other forms of weather manipulation are decades old, and a wider range of methodologies have since been implemented.

Here is an article from William and Mary Law that describes cloud seeding, weather modification and solar geoengineering policy from 2021 Enhancing the Weather: Governance of Weather Modification Activities of the United States.

Support Canada Free Press

Take a gander at another article from Technology Review about titanium dioxide particles used in seeding clouds:“titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a shell layer and sodium chloride crystal core. This nanoengineered shell core structured material can be activated at much broader relative humidity conditions such as about 65%. Because the coated nanolayers are more hydrophilic and porous, the water can be absorbed easily and increase the local relative humidity of the crystals and increase the probability of forming water droplets. So it is a synergistic effect.”

also: “We designed and fabricated a porous nanocomposite of 3D reduced graphite oxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles.”

“One patent is filed on the titanium dioxide, sodium chloride material for warm cloud seeding, and another patent is filed for porous graphite oxide, silica dioxide, nano compensated for cold cloud seeding.”

Take New Hampshire that has also begun action to halt stratospheric aerosol injection, and place limits on geo-engineering in what shows up in the skies as chemtrails that the media denigrates as a fairy tale.

None of the above are imaginary. Solar Radiation Management (SRM) has hit the big time with an unannounced experiment being conducted in San Francisco Bay area April 4, 2024. Scientific American ran an article describing the quiet pursuit of geo-engineering to block sunlight. This is being heavily promoted by Bill Gates, who has spent billions to indoctrinate the masses with the ludicrous idea that global warming (which actual statistics negate) can and should be manipulated by shooting salt crystals (to start) in an aerosol form into the atmosphere to inhibit the sun’s rays from making their way to the earth’s surface.

Should readers still believe that this is unsubstantiated and the states are jousting with windmills, here are a few more articles for reference:

Weather modification project reports from NOAA: Weather Modification Project Reports

How geoengineering works; from Rutgers regarding SRM Solar Radiation Management with sulfur; 100 patents on weather modification; and this one on inadvertent weather modification.

To cap it off, the DOD is interested in geo-engineering as a deterrent to Directed Energy Weaponry (DEW) that media has partially written off as a rightwing fable.

Noticing the problems being created by weather modification efforts, states must pass serious legislation to prohibit private, NGOs, and governmental entities from spraying and dropping nanoparticles from the heights. It should be noted that weather modification isn’t being practiced all around the world, but experimentation has been concentrated in North America, particularly the United States.

Those white fluffy streaks seen criss-crossing what would otherwise be blue skies are not a figment of the imagination. They are attempts to alter the earth’s natural weather patterns, and are the real manmade influence on “climate change.”

1. Of interest: it’s nearly impossible to find a website that quotes the Constitution without adding their ideological “interpretation,” assuming that We, the People aren’t capable of understanding the original text.

VIEW Comments