WhatFinger

Inflation, the beloved Keynesian goal, has the opposite effect

The Deflation Bogeyman


By —— Bio and Archives--November 6, 2010

American Politics, News, Opinion | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Declining prices are not necessarily bad.

The Fed plans to add massively to the supply of phony money by monetizing the Federal debt with QE2, its latest multi-trillion dollar intervention to manipulate the financial system and to control business production and employment decisions.

.

The effect, in the short run, is to inflate further the developing stock market bubble, preparing the way for our next inflation-induced recession.  In the long run, we the people are to be robbed of the purchasing power of our salaries, wages, and retirement incomes by the disguised tax of inflation.

Fed chairman Bernanke’s Keynesian socialist rationale for this crime against society is his fear of deflation, a fear belied by prices of commodities that are increasing at an accelerating rate.

But let’s hypothetically accept chairman Bernanke’s fantasy and suppose that, in the present economy, prices were stable or beginning to decline.  Is all deflation necessarily bad?

For several decades the computer world and its related products have experienced what Keynesian economists like Paul Krugman would call massive deflation.  The price per unit of computing power, if there is such a thing, is a tiny fraction of the price in the late 1950s.  The business result has been an explosion of demand, not an economic disaster.

The normally expected result of any production process is a drop in final prices to buyers, as businesses compete and become more efficient.  This is by definition true if the money supply is held steady and the value of the dollar is sustained, because, as production increases, there are more goods in relation to the money supply.

A gradual decline in prices is an enormous benefit, not a problem, because it increases the purchasing power of people’s existing wages, salaries, and retirement incomes.  A dollar will buy more, possibly of higher quality, today than it did yesterday. 

Inflation, the beloved Keynesian goal, has the opposite effect. 

The major reason for the receding American middle-class dream since the 1960s is that costs of living have increased faster than people’s money incomes.  And every effort to raise wages, by organized labor union thuggery or legislative increases in minimum wages, has led politicians to increase the money supply faster than the increase in available goods and services, adding fuel to inflation.  A dollar today will buy less than it did yesterday.


CFPSubcribe

Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Thomas Brewton -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Thomas E. Brewton—Native of Louisiana; graduated from Louisiana State University in 1956.  While there had the good fortune to study political science under Eric Voegelin and Constitutional law under Walter Berns.

Graduated from the Harvard Business School in 1958, then worked in the Wall Street financial community for thirty years.  After retiring, surrounded by liberals in Scarsdale, New York, began writing op-ed pieces for local newspapers and essays for my children, aiming to counter the barbarism of liberal-socialism.  From this came my website, “The View From 1776”


Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: