The Media's Obsession with the Sound of Freedom

The Marxist media wasted no time attacking the movie, 'Sound of Freedom'. All of the media mouthpieces attacked the movie in an effort to discredit it and convince Americans that the movie isn't worth seeing. At the same time, theaters across the nation refunded advance ticket purchases without notice. Movie goers found out their tickets had been cancelled when they went to the theater to see the movie. When asked why their tickets were refunded, the theaters claimed it was because their air conditioning wasn't working.

As many movie goers reported, the theater's air conditioning was working just fine on the side showing Indiana Jones and the Dial of Disappointment. And, there's a TikTok video that shows people being removed from a screening of 'Sound of Freedom' without explanation. The only logical conclusion is that the owners of these theaters, like the Marxist media, do not want people aware of the child sex trafficking rings that are being facilitated by open borders; borders that were opened for child sex traffickers, drug cartels, and criminals to enter without hindrance.

Where's the media outrage over the little girls being dropped off at our borders after being raped multiple times by criminals that were paid to drop them off?

Furthermore, the media's hostile reaction to the movie is unwarranted, unless they have a stake in child sex trafficking and want to keep it concealed from the public. Why else would the media be so opposed to a movie based on a true story that exposes child sex trafficking and slavery? Could it be that the media fears that we will connect the accounts of unaccompanied children being dropped off at our border with child sex trafficking? Where do all those children disappear to? Who takes them?

Moreover, it's highly probable that unaccompanied children are being dropped off at our border and then transported to child sex traffickers across the nation; where they are forced into sex slavery or used in satanic rituals. That begs the question: Why is the media as silent as the dead about all the unaccompanied children being dumped at our border by child rapists and flesh peddlers?

Where's the media outrage over the little girls being dropped off at our borders after being raped multiple times by criminals that were paid to drop them off? Does anyone hear any outrage from the media or Congress about that? Where's Lindsey Graham's outrage, or Chuck Schumer's, or Mitch McConnell's, or Nancy Pelosi's, or Kevin McCarthy's outrage over that?These heartless and soulless servants of Satan don't give a damn about children. Donald Trump is the only leader in America, to my knowledge, that has acknowledged child sex trafficking, and has tried to do something about it. All Joe Biden and the Democrats have done is facilitate it.

Moreover, why isn't the Marxist media outraged by all the unaccompanied children being dropped off at our border instead being outraged by the true story of a Homeland Security agent working to free children from sex traffickers and the evil elitists that pay to use them as sex slaves or victims in their evil satanic rituals? The media's outrage over the movie is confounding to those who don't know how evil the people are that own our government officials and the media. How evil are they?

Why isn't the Marxist media outraged by all the unaccompanied children being dropped off at our border 

Moreover, why isn't the Marxist media outraged by all the unaccompanied children being dropped off at our border instead being outraged by the true story of a Homeland Security agent working to free children from sex traffickers and the evil elitists that pay to use them as sex slaves or victims in their evil satanic rituals? The media's outrage over the movie is confounding to those who don't know how evil the people are that own our government officials and the media. How evil are they?

According to an article titled, Sodom on the Potomac, about Henry W. Vinson's "Confessions of a D.C. Madam: The Politics of Sex, Lies, and Blackmail", "it is apparent that sexual degeneracy is endemic in society’s top political and media circles, leftist and conservative. homosexuality is rampant... and elite homosexuals frequently have wives and children."

The article went on to say: "Many customers, (of underage boys) most of whom were high status and well to do, paid for sex not with cash but with corporate and government-issued credit cards. In other words, consumers and taxpayers--you and I--footed their bills. Vinson (Henry W. Vinson) and his friend falsified the transactions so they would look like payments for funeral supplies."

The call-boy scandal was verified in the Washington Times, but the rest of the media buried the story just like they did Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficking and blackmail operation? The media just refused to report the true facts about the Washington call-boy scandal. Instead, they attacked the whistleblowers and the victims just like they are doing now. The media is working to cover up the horrors of child sex trafficking like they have an interest in the business.

Support Canada Free Press

Why did the movie upset the owners of the media? 

That begs the question: Why did the movie upset the owners of the media? Were they fearful and resentful of the movie because it depicted the real life experiences of Tim Ballard, a Homeland Security agent, or were they upset because the movie exposed the real reason that so many unaccompanied children are being dumped at our borders?

Without open borders, the child sex traffickers would have a difficult time bringing unaccompanied children into our country to be used as sex salves and sacrifices by the satanic cult that controls government through blackmail and bribes and the media through controlling corporate interest.

Furthermore, based on the media's unwarranted negative reaction to the movie, it's obvious that they do not want the public aware of the fact that child sex trafficking is going on right here in America, under our noses. Why else would they trash a movie that exposes it? Why else would they support the Democrats' obsession with children; calling them their children and denying the parent's rights to raise their own children and teach them responsibility and morality?

It's blatantly obvious that the media doesn't want child sex trafficking exposed

According to The Blaze, "filming for "Sound of Freedom" ended in 2018, and had a distribution deal with 20th Century Fox. However, the movie was shelved after the Walt Disney Company acquired 20th Century Fox. Disney released the rights to the movie, and it was scooped up by Angel Studios." In other words, if Angel Studios hadn't acquired the rights to the movie, it would have never seen the light of day.

Finally, the Marxist media's obsession with 'The Sound of Freedom' speaks volumes about the owners of the media and their talking heads. It's blatantly obvious that the media doesn't want child sex trafficking exposed. That forces me to conclude that the media and Hollywood moguls know that child sex trafficking will never end if it's never exposed, and that's why they are so upset about the release of the 'Sound of Freedom'; it exposes something they have an interest in. Think about it!

Related:

VIEW Comments